Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
Mohd. Zaffer – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. lists numerous applicants' details. (Para 1) |
| 2. names respondents. (Para 2) |
| 3. applicants cite precedents for ops. (Para 3) |
| 4. details applicants' recruitment facts. (Para 4) |
| 5. selection process under ops delayed. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. applicants' representations ignored. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 7. respondents defend nps applicability. (Para 13) |
| 8. respondents argue appointment date governs. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 9. no vested rights before appointment. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 10. seeks dismissal of application. (Para 18) |
| 11. court reviews record and facts. (Para 19) |
| 12. advertisements issued under ops. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 13. analyzes delhi hc precedents on ops. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 14. legitimate expectation doctrine applies. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 15. promissory estoppel and actus curiae. (Para 35 , 36) |
| 16. other hcs and cat precedents. (Para 37 , 38) |
| 17. court's analysis favors ops entitlement. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 18. applicants entitled to ops. (Para 53 , 54) |
| 19. directs ops conversion and benefits. (Para 55 , 56) |
| 20. relief limited to applicants. (Para 57) |
ORDER
Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
1. The appl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
