Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LATA BASWARAJ PATNE, Judicial Member, VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, Administrative Member
A Venkataiah – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges removal from service post-cbi acquittal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural violations and delay in departmental proceedings alleged. (Para 3) |
| 3. applicant's acquittal requires setting aside departmental penalty. (Para 4) |
| 4. punishment disproportionate to alleged misconduct. (Para 5) |
| 5. fraud details and applicant's alleged complicity. (Para 6) |
| 6. departmental proceedings independent of criminal acquittal. (Para 7) |
| 7. proper procedure followed; punishment proportionate. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 8. limited judicial review in disciplinary matters. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 9. oa dismissed; no interference warranted. (Para 12) |
O R D E R
PER: HON’BLE MR. VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
1. The present Original Application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:
“....to call for the records pertaining to the following impugned orders.
1. Memo No.F.IV/1/AV/College Road dated 2.7.2019 (Annexure-VII)
2. Memo No.F.IV/01/AV/College Road TSO dated 14.6.2022 (Annexure-X)
and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the rules and instructions prescribed and in violation of the provisions of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
