SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1687

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Abhishake Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Home Department – Respondent


ORDER

Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member

1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -

OA 1279/2025

a) Commanding the respondent No. 2 to rectify the application form by including the reserved category of the applicants and consider the name of the applicants' vis-à-vis reserved category for SPOs which was advertised vide advertisement no. 01 of 2024 dated 16-07-2024.

b) Direct the respondent no.2 to extend all the consequential benefits, including reservation benefits, to the petitioner in the selection process for the post of constable.

c) Any other order, command or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the given facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents.

OA 1656/2025

a) Commanding the respondent No. 2 to rectify the application form by including the reserved category of the applicant and consider the name of the applicants' vis-à-vis reserved category for Homeguard (VHG) which was advertised vide advertisement no. 01 of 2024 dated 16-07-2024.

b) Direct the respondent no.2 to extend a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top