SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 15600

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Veena Kothavale, Member (J), Sisir Kumar Ratho, Member (A)
C. Naganathan – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
M.A. No.310/00153 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R. Malaichamy
For the Respondents: Su. Srinivasan

A redeployed surplus government employee is only entitled to carry their last drawn pay scale as a personal protection where no matching scale exists in the new department, and repeated representations do not constitute a fresh cause of action to bypass statutory limitation periods.

Headnote:(A) CCS (Redeployment of Surplus Staff) Rules, 1990 - Rule 9.2.3 - Pay fixation on redeployment of surplus staff - Surplus employee permitted to carry previous pay scale as a personal measure in the absence of a matching scale - Claim for parity with higher pay scales existing in the new office held untenable.

(B) Limitation - Delay and Laches - Cause of action arising from rejection of representations - Mere filing of repeated representations does not extend limitation period - Original rejection dated 01/06/2012 challenged after inordinate delay of over 11 years - Application dismissed on grounds of limitation and lack of merit.

Facts of the case:
The applicant, previously a Lower Division Clerk in the National Savings Organization, was declared surplus and redeployed to the respondent's office. At the time of redeployment, he was drawing a personal pay scale under the ACP scheme. He challenged the fixation of his pay, contending it should be merged with the pay scales available in the respondent's hierarchy. His request was rejected by the respondents in 2012, and he failed to challenge the order until 2023.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found that the applicant’s pay was correctly protected as personal to him upon redeployment, as no matching pay scale existed in the respondent's office. Furthermore, the court held that the petition was barred by limitation due to significant, unexplained delay.

Issues: Whether the applicant is entitled to re-fixation of pay at par with the existing cadre in the new office and whether the claim is barred by limitation.

Ratio Decidendi: Redeployed surplus employees are entitled to carry their last drawn pay scale personally; they do not automatically acquire parity with the pay structures of the new department where no matching scale exists. Repeated representations do not cure the bar of limitation. Result : Application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. applicant's claim for pay parity upon redeployment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 15 , 16)
2. applicability of surplus staff redeployment rules. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 12 , 17 , 18 , 19)
3. limitation period for filing service-related claims. (Para 7 , 11 , 13 , 20 , 21)

O R D E R

(Hon'ble Ms. Veena Kothavale, Member(J)

The applicant has filed this OA seeking re-fixation of his pay in the LDC cadre (ACP-I) in the scale applicable to that cadre in respondents' office from the date of his joining on 14/03/2005 with all consequential benefits.

2. It is stated by the applicant that he is working as Senior Accountant in the respondents' Office. Earlier, on his selection through the Staff Selection Commission, he was appointed as LDC in the pay scale of Rs. 3050-75-3950-80-4590 in the National Savings Organization, Tamil Nadu Circle, Chennai and had joined duty on 18.05.1990. On completion of 12 years, he was granted next higher pay scale of Rs.4000-100-6000 under the ACP Scheme w.e.f. 18.05.2002 and his pay was fixed at Rs. 4000/- with date of next increment on 01/05/2003 to Rs.4100/-. He was declared surplus by the said organization on 02/02/2005. Thereafter, on 14/03/2005, he was appointed by transfer on redeployment in the respondents' office as LDC vide Office order dated 21/03/2005. As no matching pay scale was available in the respondent’s office, applicant was permitted to carry his previous pay scale of Rs.4000-100-6000 (pre-revised).

3. Applicant further states that in the respondents' office, initial pay scale of LDC is Rs. 3050-75-3950-80-4590 (pre-revised) and that of LDC (ACP-I) is Rs.4500-125-7000 (pre-revised). Since applicant was taken on the strength of LDC cadre in the respondents' office w.e.f. 14/03/2005, his service merged with LDC cadre in respondents' establishment and therefore, his pay on joining duty as LDC (ACP-I) in the respondents' office should have been fixed at Rs.4500-125-7000 (pre-revised) at par with LDC (ACP-I) cadre in the respondents' office. Since there cannot be two establishments in LDC cadre in the same Office of respondents, applicant gave several representations requesting to fix his pay in the ACP-I scale available in the respondents' Office at Rs.4500-125-7000 from the date of his joining on 14.03.2005 with all consequential service and financial benefits. However, his claim was rejected by the 3rd respondent vide order dated 01/06/2012 and on 09/08/2021. Hence this OA.

4. Upon notice, the respondents have entered appearance through their counsel Mr. Su Srinivasan, SCGSC and filed their reply statement contending that applicant was appointed as Lower Division Clerk on 18.05.1990 in the pay scale of Rs.950-20-1150-EB-25-1500/- in National Savings Organization (NSO), Calcutta Regional Office. On completion of 12 years of service, the official was granted ACP-I w.e.f. 18.05.2002 in the scale of pay Rs.4000-100-6000 as applicable to NSO and the Pay was fixed as Rs.4000/-. Thereafter, the applicant was transferred on re-deployment by Surplus Staff Cell in public interest on 14.03.2005 F/N from NSO - Tirunelveli as LDC (ACP-I) to the respondent organisation in the pay scale Rs.4000-100-6000. On transfer to the respondent department, the applicant was fixed in the scale of pay Rs.4000-100-6000 as per the existing scale of pay in NSO. The applicant was granted second financial up gradation under MACP Scheme w.e.f. 21.05.2010 on completion of 20 years of service. Also, applicant was promoted to Junior Accountant cadre w.e.f. 04.08.2010 in lieu of passing the departmental examination for the year 2006. No fixation of pay was extended on promotion to J.A. cadre as the applicant had already earned MACP. Later, the applicant was promoted to Senior Accountant cadre w.e.f. 20.12.2013.

5. It is further contended that in the DPC meeting held for MACP-III on 19/26-08-2020 for the year 2020 to review the cases of Officials who have completed 30 years of service, the case of applicant was also reviewed, but

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top