Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Anindo Majumdar, Administrative Member, Diwakar Singh, Judicial Member
Goutam Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of premature retirement challenge. (Para 2) |
| 2. procedural flaws and untimely review invalidate retirement. (Para 4) |
| 3. review based on service record justifies premature retirement. (Para 5) |
| 4. fr 56(j) allows public interest retirement without notice. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. review committee must include cvo for integrity issues. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. doubtful integrity requires material evidence, not assumptions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. impugned order quashed for inadequate basis and procedure. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
O R D E R
Per: Mr. Anindo Majumdar, Administrative Member:
The applicant has filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 before this Tribunal praying for the following relief(s):
“a) An Order do issue directing the respondents to act and proceed in accordance with the provisions of law;
b) An Order do issue quashing and/or setting aside the Office Order No. 343/2025 dated 09.09.2025 issued by the respondent No. 2 causing premature retirement of the Applicant with effect from 02.01.2026 by invoking the power under FR 56(j) of FRSR;
c) An Order do issue directing the respondents to allow the applicant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
