Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Anand S. Khati, Member (A), Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J)
Surender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police Delhi Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants challenge withdrawal of 3rd macp after 20 years from promotion. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. respondents justify withdrawal per dopt policy and sc rulings against double benefits. (Para 5) |
| 3. executive cannot withdraw judicially granted macp benefits. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. manju vashisht ratio: 3rd macp after 20 years from first promotion upheld. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. executive clarifications cannot override final judicial precedents. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. impugned orders quashed; 3rd macp restored with benefits. (Para 19 , 20) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
Since a common question of facts and law arises in the present O.As., we have heard both the O.As. together and they are being disposed of by this common order. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are primarily being extracted from O.A. No. 2562/2025 being the lead case, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The O.A. No. 2562/2025 has been filed by the applicants under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following reliefs:-
“(a) quash and set aside impugned order dated 25.06.2025 (Annexure A/1) and 02.04.2025 (Annexure A/
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
