SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2090

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member, Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member
Dharam Raj – Appellant
Versus
Lieutenant Governor, Andaman & Nicobar Islands – Respondent
O.A. 351/1053/2018



Advocates:
For the Applicant: Mr. P.C. Das, Ms. T. Maity
For the Respondents: Mr. S.C Misra

Chief Secretary imposing penalty as Disciplinary Authority when designated as Appellate Authority per delegation, after charge by competent inferior authority, violates procedure and denies natural justice by eliminating appeal forum.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19, 20, 24 - CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 26 - Disciplinary proceedings - Charge memos issued by competent authority (Secretary Personnel for Lower Grade Clerk in amalgamated cadre per Gazette Notification dated 12.02.2009) - Punishment order issued by Chief Secretary acting as Disciplinary Authority instead of Appellate Authority - Results in deviation from procedure, denial of natural justice by loss of appeal forum - Punishment and appellate orders quashed - Reinstatement directed without back wages. (Paras 17, 18, 20)

(B) Service Law - Amalgamated clerical cadre - Employee revertible to substantive post in any department where vacancy exists - High Court interim orders directing posting as Lower Grade Clerk pending writ not specifying department - Administration entitled to choose posting - Non-joining despite directions and medical excuses without compliance constitutes misconduct - Pendency of review not bar to proceedings. (Paras 13, 15, 16)

(C) Judicial Review - Scope limited to natural justice compliance, procedure adherence, evidence basis - Not re-appreciation of facts or substitution of views unless perverse or no evidence - Two charge sheets for distinct misconducts permissible. (Paras 9, 19)

Facts of the case:
Applicant, Lower Grade Clerk in amalgamated cadre, promoted/ad-hoc to higher posts quashed by High Court - Directed to join substantive post as Lower Grade Clerk - Posted to office not parent department - Failed to join citing medical reasons, sub-judice matters - Charge memos issued for non-compliance with posting and court orders - Ex-parte inquiry, dismissal by Chief Secretary, appeal dismissed by Lieutenant Governor - OA challenging proceedings on competence, procedure, malice grounds - Earlier Tribunal order quashed charges set aside by High Court, remanded.

Findings of Court:
Charges specific, proved on evidence; posting to any department valid for amalgamated cadre; misconduct established in wilful absence; procedure violated where Disciplinary Authority (Secretary Personnel) differed from punishing authority (Chief Secretary, designated Appellate Authority).

Issues: Competence of authority to issue charge memos and impose penalty; validity of postings outside parent department; duplication of charges; impact of stay orders and sub-judice matters on proceedings; maintainability of OA post-appellate dismissal.

Ratio Decidendi: Gazette delegation empowers Secretary Personnel as Disciplinary Authority for major penalties on Lower Grade Clerks - Chief Secretary imposing penalty usurps Appellate Authority role, denying natural justice - Disciplinary proceedings sustainable absent stay, non-joining court-directed posting despite opportunities amounts to misconduct; Tribunal OA maintainable despite unexhausted remedies where challenging initiation legality.

Result: OA allowed in part - Punishment order dated 16.05.2018 and appellate order dated 07.08.2018 quashed - Reinstatement with consequential benefits (no arrears for non-worked period) within 4 weeks.

Table of Content
1. applicant's reliefs and factual background. (Para 1 , 2)
2. parties' arguments on competence and compliance. (Para 3 , 4)
3. maintainability of oa despite appeal. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. validity of posting orders and high court compliance. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. distinct charges for non-compliance with court directions. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. competence of issuing and punishing authorities. (Para 17 , 18)
7. judicial review limits in disciplinary proceedings. (Para 19)
8. quashing punishment for procedural irregularity. (Para 20 , 21)

O R D E R

Per: Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, Member (A):

1. The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985,for the following reliefs: -

“a) To quash and/or set aside the impugned Memorandum of Charge-Sheet dated 21st July, 2016 which has been issued by the Secretary (Personnel), Andaman & Nicobar Administration who is not competent authority to issue such memo of charge-sheet as per the CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 and who is not the Appointment Authority of the present applicant being Annexure A-6 of this original application.

b) To quash and/or set aside the another impugned memorandum of charge-sheet dated 24th August, 2017 issued by the Secretary (Personnel), Andaman & Nicobar Administration by disclosing one article of charges without cancelling the earlier Memorandum of Charge-Sheet dated 21 July, 2016 issued by an incompetent authority being Annexure A-7 of this original application which is clearly against the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965;

c) To quash and/or set aside the impugned ex-parte Enquiry Report dated 12.12.2017 submitted by the so-called Enquiry Officer which was forwarded to the applicant vide office memos dated 1st February. 2018 and 27th February, 2018 being Annexure A-15 of this original application.

d) To quash and/or set aside the impugned penalty order of dismissal from service against the applicant vide office order No. 1349 dated 16th May, 2018 issued by the Chief Secretary, Andaman & Nicobar Administration by violation of the CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 and by violation of the solemn order passed by this Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta, Circuit Bench at Port Blair and when the issue was pending before the Hon'ble High Court to circumvent and to frustrate the grievances of the applicant, such major penalty punishment has been issued against the applicant which is absolutely against the law of the land being Annexure A-19 of this original application.

e) To pass an appropriate order directing upon the respondent authority particularly the Hon'ble Lieutenant Governor, Andaman & Nicobar Islands to allow the statutory appeal preferred by the applicant by setting aside and/or quashing the impugned penalty order of dismissal from service against the applicant vide office order No. 1349 dated 16th May, 2018 issued by the Chief Secretary, Andaman & Nicobar Administration and the applicant be reinstated in service forthwith along with all consequential benefits;

f) To declare that the entire proceeding which has been initiated by the Andaman & Nicobar Administration from the stage of issuing of charge- sheet to imposing major penalty punishment of dismissal from service against the applicant is bad in law and illegal and violation of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 because as an incompetent authority, the Secretary (Personnel) who has no power to issue the charge-sheet has issued the charge-sheet and the Chief Secretary acting as a Disciplinary Authority has issued the major penalty punishment of dismissal from service although he has not issued the charge-sheet and the allegations of the charge-sheet cannot be allowed when the judicial proceeding is pending before the appropriate court of law;

g) To declare that the entire major penalty punishment proceeding initiated by the Andaman & Nicobar Administration against the present applicant when the judicial proceeding is pending before the appropriate court of law is otherwise bad in law and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top