Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R N Singh, Member (J), B Anand, Member (A)
Dharambir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Police Through Commissioner of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and remand for merits adjudication. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. applicant's absence and criminal fir involvement facts. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 11) |
| 3. disciplinary and appellate authorities' dismissal reasons. (Para 8 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. flaws in dispensing with departmental inquiry. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. parties' arguments on article 311(2)(b) applicability. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. article 311(2)(b) requires cogent reasons for inquiry waiver. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. impugned orders set aside with reinstatement. (Para 26 , 27) |
O R D E R
(ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. R. N. Singh, Member (J)
In the present O.A., filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:-
“a) Set aside the dismissal order N0.320-430/HAP(P-II)/P&L, dated 19.02.2015,
b) passed by disciplinary authority i.e. D.C.P. Provisioning & Logistic, Delhi; Set aside the order of Appellant Authority· vide order N0.68/P-Sec. (Appeal)/SPL.C.P./P&L, dated 19.04.2016;
c) Direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant benefits.with all consequential
d) Any other order/direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, in the interest
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
