Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R.N. Singh, Judicial Member, B. Anand, Administrative Member
Sumeet Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and dismissal background (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. violation of natural justice and article 311 (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. bhagwan singh precedent on inquiry dispensation (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 29 , 30) |
| 4. subsequent events undermine inquiry impracticability (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. tulsiram patel limits on article 311(2)(b) (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 6. respondents defend dismissal as lawful (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 7. identical reasons to quashed bhagwan singh case (Para 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 8. no objective basis for dispensing inquiry (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60) |
| 9. quash orders, reinstate with liberty to proceed (Para 61 , 62) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr.B.Anand, Member (A):
By way of filing of this Original Application (O.A.) under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant seeks the following relief(s):
“i) To set-aside and quash the impugned dismissal order dated 24.11.2023, as also the order dated 11.01.2022, being utterly against the procedure of law established under the Indian Constitution and against the pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
