Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ranjana Shahi, JM, Lok Ranjan, AM
Manoj Kumar Meena – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's suspension was justifiably extended due to ongoing criminal charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. the respondent's position relies on procedural adherence in suspension extension. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. case law supports the legitimacy of prolonged suspension under serious allegations. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. court found no procedural impropriety in the extension of suspension. (Para 15 , 17 , 18) |
ORDER
Per: Hon’ble Shri Lok Ranjan, Member (A)
The present Original Application had been filed by the Applicant against the impugned Order dated 17.08.2023 of Respondent No.3, whereby the Applicant’s previous suspension vide Order dated 28.02.2023 had been extended/continued for a further period of 90 days, i.e. till 21.11.2023.
2. Based on the pleadings of the parties on record, the relevant matrix of facts in the present case had emerged to be as follows, briefly. A complaint was received in Police Station Kotwali, Dausa from one Prabhulal Sharma, Superintendent of Vikramadiya Mahila T.T. College, Dausa that at the Clerk Grade-II Recruitment Examination-2020 of Rajasthan High Court that was organised at the said College with Centre Code No.15037 on 13.03.2022, an informa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
