Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R. N. Singh, Member (J), Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's career history and impugned orders (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. fr 56(j) premature retirement arbitrary (Para 4) |
| 3. doubtful integrity justifies premature retirement (Para 5) |
| 4. rebuttal to respondents' integrity claims (Para 6) |
| 5. framing issues and impugned orders review (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. judicial review limits on fr 56(j) (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. entire service record mandates consideration (Para 13) |
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):-
By filing the present O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant is seeking the following reliefs:-
"A. Direct the Ministry of External Affairs to set aside/quash the order No. Q/PA-I/551/01/2020, dated 02.06.2022 declaring the same to be arbitrary and without any cogent reasons;
B. Direct the Ministry of External Affairs to set aside/quash the Order No. PA-I/551/01/2020 dated 19.07.2022 issued by the Ministry of External Affairs on the recommendations of the Representation Committee;
C. Direct the Ministry of External Affairs to bring on record the documents which were considered by the Ministry while passing the order No. Q/PA_I/551/01/2020, dated 02.06.2022;
D. Pass any other order/directions in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
