SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2743

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Judicial Member, Rajinder Kashyap, Administrative Member
Ankeet – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti – Respondent
O.A. No. 2535/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Bipin Kr Jha
For the Respondents: Mr. S. Rajappa

Employer justified in withholding joining of selected candidate pending criminal trial outcome despite disclosure, when charges involve moral turpitude like exam fraud; no obligation to await acquittal.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Service law - Appointment to public employment - Pending criminal trial - Candidate qualified examinations, issued appointment letter subject to verification and affidavit of no pending cases - Disclosed FIR and charge-sheet in serious offences of conspiracy and cheating in competitive exam - Employer withheld joining pending trial outcome - No suppression of facts - Employer justified in deferring appointment without cancellation of candidature, as allegations involve moral turpitude and integrity, not required to await trial result. (Paras 9-20)

(B) Criminal jurisprudence - Presumption of innocence - Applies in trial domain but employer entitled to assess suitability pragmatically for institutional integrity - No right to appointment merely on selection; subject to antecedents verification. (Paras 18)

Facts of the case:
Applicant selected for post, issued appointment letter with condition to submit affidavit of no pending criminal/civil cases and subject to police verification. Disclosed pending CBI case involving examination malpractice post-appointment. Employer refused joining pending trial, without cancelling candidature.

Findings of Court:
No direction to allow joining subject to trial outcome; action of withholding joining valid. Respondents to decide expeditiously post-trial; if acquitted, consider per rules.

Issues: Whether candidate charge-sheeted in serious criminal case, having disclosed facts, entitled to join service pending trial or restraint on candidature cancellation.

Ratio Decidendi: Employer has discretion to withhold appointment where serious criminal charges pending against candidate despite disclosure; not obliged to wait for acquittal, especially offences affecting suitability like exam rigging. Candidature kept alive subject to final outcome.

Result: Original Application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of recruitment and pending cbi case (Para 2 , 3 , 10)
2. applicant's contentions on innocence and rights violation (Para 4 , 6)
3. respondents' defense on pending criminal charges (Para 5)
4. case laws cited by parties on suitability (Para 7 , 12 , 13)
5. employer discretion in pending serious criminal cases (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
6. dismissal with candidature subject to trial outcome (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)

ORDER

Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):-

By filing the present O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant is seeking the following reliefs:-

"A. To direct the respondent to allow the applicant to join the service subject to outcome of the trial or alternatively direct the respondent not to cancel the candidature of the candidate till the trial is over;

B. To pass any other or further order as it deems fit in favour of the applicant;

C. To award the cost."

FACTS OF THE CASE

2. As stated by the applicant, the Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti issued an advertisement bearing No. F.No-2-4/2021-NVS (Estt.-1)/JSA (Annexure-A/2) for recruitment to various posts for the year 2021 2022. The application window for the said recruitment remained open from 12.01.2022 to 10.02.2022. The applicant applied for the post of Junior Secretariat Assistant (JSA) and appeared in the Tier-I examination conducted on 09.03.2022 (Annexure-A/3). The result of the Tier-I examination was declared on 28.06.2022 (Annexure-A/4) wherein the applicant was declared successful. Subsequently, the Tier-II examination, consisting of a typing test, was conducted on 13.12.2022 (Annexure-A/5), and the applicant duly participated in the same. Thereafter, the recruiting authority issued a letter dated 30.01.2023 calling the applicant for verification of documents and eligibility criteria on 18.02.2023, which he attended, and his documents were verified. The final result of the Tier-II examination was declared on 13.04.2023 (Annexure-A/7), and the applicant was again declared successful. Following his selection, the applicant received an appointment letter dated 04.10.2023 directing him to join the service on or before 20.10.2023 and to submit an affidavit regarding any pending criminal or civil cases. Meanwhile, on 09.06.2023, the CBI registered an FIR concerning an examination centre in Mohali and a person named Ms. Ritu and the applicant was arrayed as accused on the basis of information provided by AIIMS, New Delhi.

2.1 At a later stage, allegedly on the basis of a statement made by a co- accused due to personal animosity, the applicant was arrayed as an accused in the said case, and the criminal proceedings bearing No. RC- 219/2023/E-0015 [Annexure-A/9 (Colly)] are presently pending before the Rouse Avenue District Court, New Delhi. The applicant asserts that he did not suppress this material fact and truthfully disclosed the pendency of the criminal proceeding in the affidavit submitted to the recruiting authority when required to do so. Thereafter, on 20.10.2023, the recruiting authority sought details of the police station where the FIR had been registered, which the applicant promptly furnished via return email on the same date, while also requesting that he be permitted to join the service. However, despite his representation dated 20.10.2023 requesting permission to join, no reply was received from the respondents.

2.2 Aggrieved by the inaction of the recruitment authority and the uncertainty surrounding his candidature, the applicant has approached this Tribunal by way of the present O.A. The applicant has accordingly prayed for directions to the respondents to allow him to join the service subject to the outcome of the criminal trial, or alternatively, not to cancel his candidature till the conclusion of the trial, along with any other appropriate relief deemed fit by the Tribunal.

3. Pursuant to notice issued by this Tribunal, the respondents have filed reply oppo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top