Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, Judicial Member, Pramod Kumar Das, Administrative Member
Parsuram Sethi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prayer for regularization of daily wager service. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prior proceedings and rejection orders reviewed. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. long service mandates regularization per precedents. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. oa allowed with retrospective regularization direction. (Para 9 , 10) |
O R D E R
PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):
The applicant has filed this OA seeking for direction to the respondents to regularize his service in the post of Daftary w.e.f. the date of his initial engagement by quashing the orders dated 21.06.2021 [A/12], 21.06.2021 [A/13) and letter dated 25.06.2021 [A/14]. According to Ld. Counsel for the applicant, taking into consideration the continuance of the applicant as a daily wager since 1999, throwing him from his engagement at this age amounts to snatching his livelihood offending to Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Hence, he prayed that taking into consideration thJea mggiloes Vtornse. Udenciiosino nosf oInf dthiea Haonnd’ bOlet hAepresx, Court in the cases of Vinod Kumar & Ors. Vs. Unio2n0 2o4f SInCdC iaO &nL Oinres .S, C 3826, Dharam Singh & Othe(r2s0 2V4s). 9S tSaCteC 3o2f 7U/.2P0 2&4 A(1n)o StChRe r1, 230, Shrip(Cailv ailn Adp Apnera.l Nvros
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
