O R D E R

PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):

The applicant has filed this OA seeking for direction to the respondents to regularize his service in the post of Daftary w.e.f. the date of his initial engagement by quashing the orders dated 21.06.2021 [A/12], 21.06.2021 [A/13) and letter dated 25.06.2021 [A/14]. According to Ld. Counsel for the applicant, taking into consideration the continuance of the applicant as a daily wager since 1999, throwing him from his engagement at this age amounts to snatching his livelihood offending to Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Hence, he prayed that taking into consideration thJea mggiloes Vtornse. Udenciiosino nosf oInf dthiea Haonnd’ bOlet hAepresx, Court in the cases of Vinod Kumar & Ors. Vs. Unio2n0 2o4f SInCdC iaO &nL Oinres .S, C 3826, Dharam Singh & Othe(r2s0 2V4s). 9S tSaCteC 3o2f 7U/.2P0 2&4 A(1n)o StChRe r1, 230, Shrip(Cailv ailn Adp Apnera.l Nvros.8. 5N5a8 goaf r2 0N1i8g, admisp, oGsehda ozfi aobna 1d9,. 08.2025), Bhola Nath Vs State of Jhark2h0a2n5d SaCnCd OOnrLsin, e SC 221, and 2026 SCC Online SC 129, he is entitled to be regularized retrospectively, which would protect his present and post retirement life and livelihood.

2. Respond