Back
Next 
J. K. MAHESHWARI, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellants having registered themselves with the Employment Exchange claim to have worked as casual workers with the Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Gwalior for a considerable period of time. Under the expectation that they would be conferred temporary status and their services would be thereafter regularized, the appellants initially made representations to the Income Tax Department. On their request not being accepted, the appellants approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench1 [For short the ‘Tribunal’] by preferring Original Application No. 719 of 2012 with a prayer to consider their cases for regularization in service. The Tribunal by its judgment dated 13.05.2015 held that the services of the appellants were not liable to be regularized on the ground that they did not fulfil the basic criteria of regular service for a period of ten years as on 10.04.2006 in terms of the judgment in Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others vs. Umadevi and Others, 2006 INSC 216. Being aggrieved, the appellants app
Regularisation – There can be no discrimination in the matter of regularizing services of similarly situated employees.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article