SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 3228

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Umesh Gajankush, Judicial Member, Sangam Narain Srivastava, Administrative Member
NITIN MADHUKARRAO TINKHEDE – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORIGINAL APPLICATION No.367/2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R.G. Walia
For the Respondents: S. Ravi

Withdrawal of financial benefits under MACP having civil consequences without prior show cause notice violates natural justice principles, requiring pre-decisional hearing.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Principles of natural justice - Withdrawal of financial upgradation benefits under MACP Scheme having civil consequences - Impugned order withdrawing Grade Pay benefit without prior show cause notice or opportunity of hearing held violative of audi alteram partem rule - Action with civil consequences mandates pre-decisional hearing as per Swadeshi Cotton Mills Vs. Union of India (1981) 1 SCC 664 and D.K. Yadav Vs. J.M.A. Industries Ltd (1993) 3 SCC 259 - Order set aside; respondents at liberty to issue fresh notice after hearing. (Paras 12-15)

(B) Service Law - MACP Scheme - Direct promotion bypassing intermediate grade - Employees promoted from Assistant Loco Pilots (GP 1900) directly to Loco Pilots (Goods) (GP 4200) without serving in Senior Assistant Loco Pilot (GP 2400) - Entitlement to further upgradation to GP 4800 questioned but not adjudicated on merits due to procedural infirmity. (Paras 3.1-3.3)

Facts of the case:
Group of Chief Loco Inspectors (GP 4600) granted 3rd MACP to GP 4800 w.e.f. 01.09.2008 vide order dated 11.03.2011 - Subsequently withdrawn vide order dated 07.08.2014 pursuant to Railway Board letters dated 05.10.2011 and 13.12.2012 on ground of having earned 3 prior grade pays (1900-2400-4200-4600) despite bypassing GP 2400 - No prior notice issued; recovery ordered.

Findings of Court:
Impugned order dated 07.08.2014 quashed for violation of natural justice - Status quo ante restored - Any pre-existing recovery to be refunded within 60 days - Respondents permitted to proceed afresh with proper notice and hearing - No adjudication on MACP entitlement merits.

Issues: Whether withdrawal of granted financial upgradation without prior opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice; validity of MACP denial based on bypassed promotion channel.

Ratio Decidendi: Any departmental action withdrawing benefits with civil consequences requires prior show cause notice and hearing to satisfy audi alteram partem; mere post-facto representation inadequate - Erroneous grant by department itself necessitates procedural fairness before reversal, distinguishing from claims based on third-party benefits.

Result: Original Application allowed; impugned order set aside.

Table of Content
1. parties and respondents identified (Para 1)
2. macp benefits withdrawn unlawfully (Para 2)

Mil A a l n p h J a a n c s k o son DDP3P6CRLDF 0b oo ho iN Nea g f7 cx os at 7: = eai c t tn s t d aC aM : 9 to e Pi 9 l l o2 = 2Cin =y 1 l Dn0 6a I : o N9 s :2F 9nI d c i, 6 f g a e8eJ R O . n m = 0 a 41 e e= 3 c40 a dP tk . 0e h d1 s1 ed1 b e e6 o2 r7 y r s na1 0 f8 o V M u6 3bA n5 e t: ,d i hl 4 lae r p a S9 s o l7 h n, 4= i r : b o a O 3 cM J o c n n7 7 aI f 5 : as D 6 + c t 6 2 oh h3 0 .k2 0 a i8 5 s s 3 2 r0 ' o5 34 d6 n 0 sd4 . o9 h ' f A c 91 6 t 0 u l r6e p5 a m 14 h= , 08 a e 0 S80 n n 8 E32 s t 1 Rb o581I a A78 1 L69 0 N8a ea4U fcd0M 1a5 8 Be7 458E 8 bR 48d= c2930 6 fd f89 7f205 dd7 41c c 83f b 9d8 64b bf0a 1 b 51f 8d6 bc,4 , , Order reserved on : 23.01.2026 Order pronounced on: 06.03.2026 ORDER Per: Shri Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)

The present OA has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:

(a) This Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to call for the records and proceedings which led to the passing of the impugned order dated 07.08.2014 and after going through its propriety, legality and constitutional validity be pleased to quash and set aside the same with full consequential benefits.

(b) This Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to call for the records and proceedings which led to the passing of the impugned order Orders dated 13.12.2012 (Annx.”A2”) and 05.10.2011 (Annx.”A3”) and after going through its propriety, legality and constitutional validity be pleased to quash and set aside the same with full consequential benefits.

(c) This Hon’ble Tribunal will be pleased hold and declare that the orders dated 11.03.2011 as far as the present applicants are concerned are legal and proper and the applicants are entitled to the benefits which accrued to them from the said orders.

(d) This Hon’ble Tribunal will be pleased to order and direct the respondents to refund and return any amount if recovered from the applicants with 18% interest per annum till the payment is made.

(e) This Hon’ble Tribunal will be pleased to hold and declare that the applicants are entitled to the Grade Pay Rs.4800/- as was granted to them vide order dated 11.03.2011 with effect from 01.09.2008 and accordingly to restore all the benefits accruing from the said order to the applicants with arrears of difference of salary alongwith 18%

interest thereon.

Mil A a l n p h J a a n c s k o son DDP3P6CRLDF 0b oo ho iN Nea g f7 cx os at 7: = eai c t tn s t d aC aM : 9 to e Pi 9 l l o2 = 2Cin =y 1 l Dn0 6a I : o N9 s :2F 9nI d c i, 6 f g a e8eJ R O . n m = 0 a 41 e e= 3 c40 a dP tk . 0e h d1 s1 ed1 b e e6 o2 r7 y r s na1 0 f8 o V M u6 3bA n5 e t: ,d i hl 4 lae r p a S9 s o l7 h n, 4= i r : b o a O 3 cM J o c n n7 7 aI f 5 : as D 6 + c t 6 2 oh h3 0 .k2 0 a i8 5 s s 3 2 r0 ' o5 34 d6 n 0 sd4 . o9 h ' f A c 91 6 t 0 u l r6e p5 a m 14 h= , 08 a e 0 S80 n n 8 E32 s t 1 Rb o581I a A78 1 L69 0 N8a ea4U fcd0M 1a5 8 Be7 458E 8 bR 48d= c2930 6 fd f89 7f205 dd7 41c c 83f b 9d8 64b bf0a 1 b 51f 8d6 bc,4 , , (f) Any other and further orders as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit, proper and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case.

(g) Costs of this Original Application may be provided for.”

2.

Brief facts of the case as stated in the OA are that by impugned order dated 07.08.2014, the respondents have withdrawn the Financial Upgradation Benefits under the MACP Scheme as granted to the applicants vide order dated 11.03.2011 w.e.f. 01.09.2008 onwards. It is stated that the applicants were granted the benefit of Grade Pay of Rs.4800/- w.e.f. 01.09.2008. However, the said benefits have been withdrawn and the applicants were reverted back to Grade Pay of Rs.4600/- which the applicants were already drawing prior to 01.09.2008. It is stated that as on 01.09.2008, the applicants have stagnated for 10 years in Grade Pay of Rs.4600/-. Thus, they were fully entitled to Grade Pay of Rs.4800/- w.e.f. 01

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top