Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Chhabilendra Roul, Administrative Member, Rajveer Singh Verma, J
R. Sivakami – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. historical pay parity among teaching posts disrupted by cpc (Para 1 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 2. claim equal pay for nutritionist as teaching faculty (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. oa barred by limitation; no parity for non-nursing post (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. pay scales determined by expert bodies, not courts (Para 14 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. refer pay issue to 8th pay commission for review (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
O R D E R
By Hon’ble Mr. Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J) :-
The UPSC had issued an advertisement No.11, inviting applications for various posts including the post of Nutritionist (Non-nursing Teaching Post) under the respondent college from the candidates possessing Masters Degree in Nutrition with about five years of teaching experience in Nutrition or allied subjects. The applicant on being successful in the selection process, was issued offer of appointment on 09.05.2005. She joined the respondent college on27.03.2006.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that on 23.10.2008, the applicant‟s pay was revised and refixed w.e.f. 01.01.2006 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200. Learned counsel for the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
