SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 3420

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K. Haripal, Judicial Member, Braj Mohan Agrawal, Administrative Member
Saralakumary VV – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
O.A.No.180/00472/2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. P.A.Kumaran, Mr.Nirmal V. Nair
For the Respondents: Mr. M.K.Padmanabhan Nair, ACGSC

Judicial review in disciplinary proceedings limited to natural justice and evidence existence; punishment modified from removal to termination for GDS misconduct.

Headnote:The proceedings were initiated under Rule 10 of the Department of Posts, Gramin Dak Sevaks (Conduct and Engagement) Rules, 2011, for failure to deliver approximately 250 unregistered postal articles retained since 2009, in violation of Rules 115, 129(1), 129(2) of Postal Manual Volume VI Part III and Rule 21 thereof. Essential facts involved seizure of undelivered items including prasadams and book posts from the applicant's residence during inspection on 04.04.2012, leading to enquiry where charges were upheld based on inventory and witness statements. The Tribunal found the disciplinary process followed natural justice, with findings supported by evidence despite some hostile witnesses. Key issues framed as whether enquiry findings were perverse, lacking admissible evidence, and punishment disproportionate, with allegations of procedural lapses and personal grudge. Ratio decidendi emphasized limited judicial review scope in disciplinary matters, not re-appreciating evidence unless no evidence exists or natural justice violated, citing principles that courts interfere only if findings are arbitrary or perverse (B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India; High Court of Judicature at Bombay v. Shashikant S Patil; Union of India v. K.G. Soni). Original Application partly allowed; punishment of removal modified to termination, entitling applicant to severance and ex-gratia amounts payable within 60 days, without reinstatement.

Table of Content
1. facts of undelivered articles seizure and disciplinary initiation. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 10 , 11 , 17 , 18)
2. applicant's challenges to evidence, procedure, and proportionality. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 12 , 13 , 15)
3. enquiry process followed with supporting evidence despite changes. (Para 14 , 16 , 19 , 20)
4. limited judicial review; findings based on evidence, punishment justified. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. punishment modified to termination with severance benefits. (Para 29 , 30 , 31)

ORDER

Justice K.Haripal, Judicial Member

Applicant was GDS Mail Deliverer in Thengumcavu Post Office, within Pathanamthitta Postal Division, from January 1996 till she was placed on put off duty on 07.04.2012. Thereafter, proceedings under Rule 10 of the Department of Posts, Gramin Dak Sevaks (Conduct and Engagement) Rules, 2011 was initiated against her raising three Articles of charges, as extracted below:

Article-1 : That the said Smt. V.V. Saralakumary while functioning as GDSMD, Thengumcavu, GDSBO (sic) failed to deliver around 250 unregistered articles of the letter mail entrusted to her for delivery on various dates since 2009 and she kept the said articles in her house in the steel almirah without furnishing the remarks for non-delivery or returning to the BPM, until detected by Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices, Pathanamthitta Sub Division on 4.4.2012 in contravention of Rules 115, 129(1) and 129(2) of Postal Manual Volume VI Part III (corrected upto 30th June 1986) and thereby failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty violating Rule 21 of Department of Posts Gramin Dak Sevaks (Conduct and Engagement) Rules, 2011

Article-II: That the said Smt. VV. Saralakumary while functioning as GDSMD, Thengumcavu failed to deliver an ordinary article addressed to Smt. Maniamma, Kaipramurupel House, Thengumcavu P.O., Mallassery entrusted to her for delivery during March-2011 and kept the article inside the Steel Almirah in her house until detected by Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices, Pathanamthitta Sub Division on 4.4.2012 in contravention of Rules 115, 129(1) and 129(2) of Postal Manual Volume VI Part III (corrected upto 30th June 1986) and thereby failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty violating Rule 21 of Department of Posts Gramin Dak Sevaks (Conduct and Engagement) Rules, 2011.

Article-III: That the said Smt. VV. Saralakumary while functioning as Thengumcavu P.O., Mallasery failed to deliver an article addressed to Sri. K.V. Asokan, Kalarilkkunnathil House, Thengumcavu P.O., Mallassery entrusted to her for delivery during October, 2010 and kept the article inside the Steel Almirah in her house until detected by Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices, Pathanamthitta Sub Division on 4.4.2012 in contravention of Rules 115, 129(1) and 129(2) of Postal Manual Volume VI Part III (corrected upto 30th June 1986) and thereby failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty violating Rule 21 of Department of Posts Gramin Dak Sevaks (Conduct and Engagement) Rules, 2011."

2. She denied the charges. Then Sri. S.Ramakrishna Sharma ASP (OD & MKTG), Pathanamthitta was appointed as enquiry authority and Smt.Ashalekshmi S.V. as the presenting officer. Later, on transfer of Sri.Ramakrishna Sharma, Smt.Ashalekshmi was appointed as the enquiry authority and Sri.R.Rattankumar, Inspector of Post Offices as the presenting officer. Subsequently, Smt.Deepa Murali, IP, Adoor Sub Division was nominated as the enquiry authority and Sri.O.M.Manoj was appointed as the presenting officer. On conclusion of enquiry, applicant was found guilty of the charges. Thereafter, disciplinary authority imposed a punishment of removing her from engagement with immediate effect. Against that order, she preferred appeal, but the appellate authority dismissed the appeal on 15.10.2014. Revision was also dismissed by the CPMG.

3. Aggrieved by the same, the applicant has approached this Tribunal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top