Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M L Srivastava, Administrative Member
M Raja Climax – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and pay scale revision issue. (Para 2) |
| 2. precedents support pay revision from 01.01.1996. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. oa barred by limitation and laches. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. history of anomaly committee and judicial affirmations. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. equality mandates benefits for similarly situated employees. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. notional pay from 1996, actual from 2004. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 7. oa allowed with specified directions. (Para 41) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
The applicant has filed the OA seeking the following relief:
“A) ….To call for records and proceedings of the case which led to the passing of the orders i.e (i) Office Memorandum in File No.6/37/98-IC dated 21.04.2004 ie Annexure -A1 and (ii) Office Memorandum in File No.26017/65/2003-Ad.II-A(Pt) dated 11.05.2004 i.e Annexure A.2 its subsequent (latest) Office Memorandum in File No. A.26017/65/2003-Ad.II-A(Pt)25.07.2023 i.e Annexure A3 and after going though their propriety, legality and constitutional validity be pleased to quash an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
