Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J)
Jeevan Lal Lavidiya – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of cbi arrest and suspension. (Para 1) |
| 2. applicant's argument: suspension lapses without 90-day review. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondents' contention: 90-day review from bail date. (Para 5) |
| 4. court reproduces ccs rules 10(6) and 10(7). (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. precedents hold 90-day review mandatory despite bail. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. judicial discipline requires following binding precedents. (Para 12) |
| 7. proviso inapplicable; suspension lapsed on 08.08.2025. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 8. impugned extension quashed; reinstatement directed. (Para 16) |
ORDER
1. Brief facts of the case are that the applicant is an Indian Revenue Service (IRS) officer of 2004 batch and while he was serving at the past of commissioner of Income tax at Hyderabad, CBI registered R.C. No. 21820025 A 0012 dated 09.05.2025 against him and he was arrested by CBI on 10.05.2025. The applicant was enlarged on bail on 21.06.2025. As a result of his detention, he was placed under deemed suspension w.e.f. 10.05.2025 vide order dated 26.05.2025 passed by the respondent no.1 in exercise of the power conferred under Rule 10(2)(a) and Rule 10(2)(b) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965. Thereafter, the responden
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
