Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ranjit More, Chairman, Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
S. Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. joint disposal of identical oas. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual timeline of appointment and seniority dispute. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 3. applicant's claims of erroneous seniority and discrimination. (Para 6) |
| 4. respondents defend seniority under ifs rules. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. claim barred by delay and laches. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. non-joinder of necessary parties fatal. (Para 12) |
| 7. seniority fixed per ifs seniority rules 1997. (Para 13) |
| 8. no discrimination; cases not similarly situated. (Para 14) |
| 9. preet pal singh distinguishable on facts. (Para 15) |
| 10. oas dismissed on limitation and merits. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):
Since the issues involved in the present Original Applications are identical and arise out of a common set of facts, with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, both the O.As. are taken up together and disposed of by way of this common order. For the sake of convenience and clarity in the narration of facts and adjudication of the issues involved, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, O.A. No. 539/2023 is treated as the lead case and the facts therein are being referred to for the purpo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
