Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J), Sumeet Jerath, Member (A)
Deepak – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the applicant's appointment, alleged exam malpractice, and subsequent termination. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments concerning proportionality, double punishment, and denial of natural justice. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. respondent's justification of zero-tolerance policy against exam malpractice and impersonation. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. court's ruling on the requirement of departmental inquiry for stigmatic terminations and violation of proportionality. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Ms. Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J):
Brief facts of the case as narrated by the applicant in this OA are that the applicant was working on the post of Grade-II (DASS)/Assistant Section Officer in the Department of Food, Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. The Service Department (II), GNCTD, vide notification dated 25.04.2019, nominated 50 dossiers of candidates provisionally selected by DSSSB, which included the name of the applicant. Pursuant thereto, the applicant was issued an appointment letter dated 08.07.2019 a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
