Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R.N. Singh, Judicial Member, B. Anand, Administrative Member
Chandan Mishra Dwivedi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. alleged irregularities in exams led to delayed disciplinary action. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. inordinate unexplained delay vitiates proceedings causing prejudice. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. delay explained by cbi probe and procedures; no prejudice shown. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 4. no quashing on delay without prejudice; allow inquiry to proceed. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 5. oa dismissed without costs. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr.B.Anand, Member (A):
By way of filing this Original Application (O.A.) under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has sought the following relief(s):-
“a. Call for the records connected with the case;
b. Quash the impugned order dated 22.11.2024 passed by the Respondent.
c. Quash the entire disciplinary proceedings/inquiry initiated against the Applicant, including Charge Memorandum dated 27.06.2023 and/or any other incidental/consequential proceedings thereto.
d. Pass any other order(s) this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. The brief factual matrix of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
