Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M.L.Srivastava, Administrative Member
Prabha Raman – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants seek revised pay scales w.e.f. 01.01.1996. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. precedents support pay parity from 01.01.1996 for similar employees. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. claims barred by limitation; no continuing cause of action. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. historical litigation led to anomaly committee recommendations. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. article 14 mandates parity for similarly situated employees. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 6. notional pay from 1996, actual from 2004; oa allowed. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr.M.L.SRIVASTAVA, Member(A)) The applicants have filed the present OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:
“(A). This Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to call for records and proceedings of the case which led to the passing of the orders i.e. (i) Office Memorandum in File No.6/37/98-IC dated 21.04.2004 i.e.Annexure-A1 and (ii) Office Memorandum in File No.A- 26017/65/2003-Ad.II-A(Pt) dated 11.05.2004 i.e. Annexure A2 and its subsequent (latest) Office Memorandum in File No.A-26017/65/2003- Ad
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
