CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M.L.Srivastava, Administrative Member
T.Duraipandian – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants seek revised pay scales w.e.f. 01.01.1996 (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. precedents support pay parity from 01.01.1996 (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. claims barred by limitation and laches (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. background of anomaly committee and precedents reviewed (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. equality mandates benefits for similarly situated employees (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 6. judgments in rem; notional from 1996, actual from 2004 (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 7. oa allowed with directed pay refixation (Para 41) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr.M.L.SRIVASTAVA, Member(A)) The applicants have filed the present OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:
“(A). This Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to call for records and proceedings of the case which led to the passing of the orders i.e. (i) Office Memorandum in File No.6/37/98-IC dated 21.04.2004 i.e.Annexure-A1 and (ii) Office Memorandum in File No.A- 26017/65/2003-Ad.II-A(Pt) dated 11.05.2004 i.e. Annexure A2 and its subsequent (latest) Office Memorandum in File No.A-26017/65/2003- Ad.II-A(


Inder Pal Yadav v. Union of India
Uttaranchal Forest Rangers’ Association (Direct Recruit) v. State of U.P.
Union of India Vs. Arun Jyoti Kundu
State of U.P. v. J.P. Chaurasia
Union of India v. P.V. Hariharan
Union of India Vs. Amarnath Goyal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.