Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Jayesh V Bhairavia, Member (J), Hukum Singh Meena, Member (A)
Kuldeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of disciplinary proceedings and appeals (Para 1 , 2 , 9) |
| 2. applicant's arguments on rights and vagueness (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents' defense of inquiry and penalty (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary matters (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. no violation of natural justice principles (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. findings based on evidence, not perverse (Para 12) |
| 7. penalty proportionate, no interference warranted (Para 13) |
| 8. oa dismissed, no costs (Para 14 , 15) |
ORDER
Per: Hon’ble Shri Jayesh V Bhairavia, Member (J)
1. The present OA has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, seeking following reliefs: -
“Para 8
(A). The Hon’ble Tribunal be pleased to quash and set aside charge sheet bearing No. Admn/G& SSA/Disc Case/Kuldeep Singh/2014 (Charge Sheet), dated 11-2- 2015, Inquiry Officer’s Report dated 10-11-2015, Disciplinary Authroity’s order dated 26.02.2016, Appellate authority’s order dated 05.09.2016 and Revisonal Authority’s order dated 22-6-2017 , being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to settled legal position and in utter violation of Principles of natural justice, null and void.
(B). B
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
