Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ajay Pratap Singh, Member (J), Rajinder Kumar Kashyap, Member (A)
Nand Ram – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. issue: gds service reckonable for mts pension? (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts: gds 32 yrs, mts 8+ yrs, nps applied. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 13) |
| 3. arguments on counting gds for pension shortfall. (Para 10 , 11 , 23) |
| 4. gds outside civil service, no pension entitlement. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. precedents bar gds service for pension. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. oa dismissed; gds not qualifying. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
O R D E R
By Hon’ble Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Member (J):
THE ISSUE
1. The precise question that arises for our determination in the present Original Application is –
“Whether the period of service rendered by the applicant as a regular M.T.S. in the Postal Department can be reckoned along with the period of service rendered as “Gramin Dak Sevak” for the purpose of determining his qualifying service for the pension under Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 (Now 2021)?”
THE PRAYER
2. Applicant, retired M.T.S. from the post of Department of Posts, has invoked the jurisdiction of this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the main relief(s) (as extracted from the OA) reads as under:-
“A. To
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
