SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1248

RANJAN GOGOI, DEEPAK GUPTA, ANIRUDDHA BOSE
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Gandiba Behera – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Ms. Kiran Suri, Shankar Divate, Meru Sagar Samantray, Jai Dehadarai, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Shekhar Dwivedi, Ms. Kiran Suri, Shankar Divate, T.A. Khan, Gurmeet Singh Makker, Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Mukesh K. Giri, Jitendra Mohapatra, Kedar Nath Tripathy, Ms. Reena Rao, Sandiv Kalia, Srilok Nath Rath, Abhishek Aanand Rai, Dr. Sushil Balwada, Sanjay Kumar Visen, Mrs. K. Sarada Devi, R. Vijay Nandan Raddy, Amarjeet Singh Dheman, S. R. Setia, Joydeep Mukerjee, Ms. Seema Kashyap, P.R. Kovilan, Mrs. Geetha Kovilan, Ms. Lakshmi K.G., Vijay Prakash, Abid Ali Beeran P, S.K. Sinha, James P. Thomas, B.K. Bereva, Md. Apzal Ansari, Mukesh K. Verma, Vivek Sharma, Harsh Singhal, Anis Ahmed Khan, V. N. Raghupathy, Md. Apzal Ansari, Maneder Pal gupta, Azhar Qayum, K.V. Jagdishvaran, Ms. G. Indira, Ms. Rangoli Seth, Ashwani Kumar, Beno Bencigar, Parijat Kishore, Puneet Kumar Saxena, Kamalkant Tripathi, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Vedant Singh, Michelle Gomes, Nikilesh Ramachandran, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.

1. Records reveal that service is not complete in S.L.P. (C) Diary No.13464/2018, S.L.P.(C) No.16615/2018, S.L.P.(C)No.3392/2019 and S.L.P.(C) Diary No.18007/2019. Hence these maters are directed to be detagged from this batch of appeals. Let these matters be placed before the appropriate Bench after completion of service.

2. Delay condoned and leave is granted in SLP (C) CC Nos. 20557-20558 of 2015 and SLP (C) No.32881 of 2018.

Leave is also granted in rest of the petitions for Special Leave to Appeal.

3. All these appeals have reached this Court from decisions of different Benches of the Central Administrative Tribunal and thereafter judgments of the High Courts on a common question of law. The dispute in these appeals is as to whether services rendered by the employees in the postal department in the capacity of Gramin Dak Sevaks (GDS) ought to be computed or not for the purpose of calculation of the qualifying service of their pension after they got selected in regular posts in the said department. The respective High Courts, whose judgments are und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top