Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, Member (J), Pramod Kumar Das, Member (A)
Dr. Chinmaya Dash – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident of unauthorized procedure triggers inquiry and disciplinary initiation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 7) |
| 2. governing body ratifies charge sheet post-issuance per regulations. (Para 4 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. charge sheets generally not quashable pre-final order. (Para 5 , 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. literal interpretation mandates prior approval for charge sheets. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. post-facto ratification invalidates stillborn charge sheet. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. oa allowed; charge sheet quashed as nullity. (Para 20) |
ORDER
Mr. Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, J.M.
The applicant challenging the charge memorandum dated 06.05.2025 issued by the respondent no. 3 has filed this OA praying for following reliefs:
(a) Quash and set aside the Memorandum of Charges dated 06.05.2025 issued against the applicant as illegal, without jurisdiction, and violative of natural justice;
(b) Declare the inquiry proceedings and committee constitution as void due to conflict of interest, procedural impropriety, and suppression of evidence;
(c) Pass an order restraining the respondents from continuing with or relying upon any proceedings arising from the impugned chare sheet;
(d) Initiate inquiry against the Executive Di
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
