Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, J, M. L. Srivastava, A
P. Rajaganapathy – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's career and pay fixation claim from 1996. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. precedents support notional pay fixation from 01.01.1996. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. claims barred by limitation and laches. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. history of anomaly committee and judicial affirmations. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. equality mandates benefits for similarly situated employees. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. notional pay from 1996, actual from 2004. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
ORAL ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:
(i) To call for the records of the respondents and to declare that the applicant herein is entitled to the benefits of revised pay scale with effect from 01.01.1996 on actual basis, i.e., from the date when the 5th CPC became operational, based on the judgements/decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and various High Courts and Tribunals and to set aside/quash the communication in letter DRI F.No.A-21021/05/2023-Chennai, dated 28.08.2025 of the Additional Director, DRI Chennai and the letter F
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
