CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M. L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
B. Chandran – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's career and pay scale anomaly claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. precedents support retrospective pay fixation from 1996. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. claims barred by limitation and laches. (Para 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. history of anomaly committee and judicial affirmations. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. equality demands uniform benefits for similarly situated employees. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. notional pay from 1996, actual from 2004. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:
(i) To call for the records of the respondents and to declare that the applicant herein is entitled to the benefits of revised pay scale with effect from 01.01.1996 on actual basis, i.e., from the date when the 5th CPC became operational, based on the judgements/decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and various High Courts and Tribunals (ii) To direct the respondents to grant benefits of revised pay and allowances to the applicant from 01.01.1996 till the time of his retirement on actual basis (iii) To grant an
Inder Pal Yadav v. Union of India
Uttaranchal Forest Rangers’ Association (Direct Recruit) v. State of U.P.
Union of India Vs. Arun Jyoti Kundu
State of U.P. v. J.P. Chaurasia
Union of India v. P.V. Hariharan
Union of India Vs. Amarnath Goyal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.