CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M. L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
S. Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
OA
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's claim for revised pay from 01.01.1996. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. precedents support retrospective pay upgradation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. claims barred by limitation and laches. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. historical litigation and anomaly committee formation. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. equality for similarly situated employees overrides delay. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. notional pay from 1996, actual from 2004. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
ORAL ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. L. Srivastava, Administrative Member)
1.This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:
(i) To call for the records of the respondents and to declare that the applicant herein is entitled to the benefits of revised pay scale with effect from 01.01.1996 on actual basis, i.e., from the date when the 5th CPV became operational, based on the judgements/decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and various High Courts and Tribunals
(ii) To direct the respondents to grant benefits of revised pay and allowances to the applicant from 01.01.1996 till the time of his retirement on actual basis
(iii) To grant and pay consequential arrears of pay and allowances for the period from 01.01.1996 to the date of his retirement
(iv) To issue revised Pension Payment Order accordingly and to grant and pay the pension arrears and post-retirement benefits along with 18% interest per annum to the applicant as the applicant is a retired government employee of the respondent department
(v) To direct the respondent to pay cost of the litigation to the applicant as the applicant has been deliberately dragged to the Tribunal by the respondent and
(vi) To issue appropriate directions or orders which this Tribunal deems fit, just and proper in the circumstances of the case to meet the ends of justice”.
2. Brief facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant:
The Applicant joined the department on 12.04.1993 as Inspector and was promoted as Superintendent on 31.05.2012. The Applicant retired after attaining superannuation. During the period from 01.01.1996, the applicant was working as Inspector of Central Excise and was drawing his pay and allowance in the pay scale of Rs.1640-60-2600-75-2900. On implementation of 5th pay commission, the pay scale of Inspector of Central Excise was initially fixed in the pay scale of Rs.5500-175-9000 and the pay scale of Superintendent in the pay scale of Rs.6500-200- 10500 effective from 01.01.1996. After acceptance of anomaly in the pay scales, the Union Government refixed in the pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 and Rs.7500-12000 respectively vide Ministry of Finance OM F.No.6/37/98-IC, dated 21.04.2004, giving effect prospectively from 21.04.2004, and not w.e.f 01.01.1996 as it should have been. Therefore, the applicant submitted his representation dated 02.06.2022 requesting to consider upgrading of his pay scale from 5500-9000 to Rs.6500-10500 w.e.f 01.01.1996 and his pays cale from Rs.6500-10500 to Rs.7500-12000 w.e.f 10.04.2001 on actual basis and to sanction & pay the consequential arrears of pay and allowances. Till date no response from the respondent. He sent a remainder on 27.06.2025, still no response. The subject issue had already attained finality and this issue is no more res integra and so, the CBIC, Department of Revenue, New Delhi vide letter F.No.A- 23011/44/2024-Ad-A, dated 10.06.2025 accepted and agreed to implement the orders of Hon’ble High Court and CAT orders. Hence the present OA.
3. The learned Counsel for the applicant invited our attention to the common order dated 09.01.2024 passed by the Hyderabad Bench of the Tribunal in OA No. 1089/2019 & batch, which was upheld by the Hon’ble High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad in W.P.(C) No. 10490/2024 by order dated 09.08.2024, and thereafter affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) Diary No. 59005/2024 by order dated 28.02.2025. Reliance was also
Inder Pal Yadav v. Union of India
Uttaranchal Forest Rangers’ Association (Direct Recruit) v. State of U.P.
State of Karnataka & Others Vs. C. Lalitha
K.L. Shephard & Others Vs Union of India & Others
Union of India Vs. Arun Jyoti Kundu
State of U.P. v. J.P. Chaurasia
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.