Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M. L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
S. Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's claim for revised pay from 01.01.1996. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. precedents support retrospective pay upgradation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. claims barred by limitation and laches. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. historical litigation and anomaly committee formation. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. equality for similarly situated employees overrides delay. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. notional pay from 1996, actual from 2004. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
ORAL ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. L. Srivastava, Administrative Member)
1.This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:
(i) To call for the records of the respondents and to declare that the applicant herein is entitled to the benefits of revised pay scale with effect from 01.01.1996 on actual basis, i.e., from the date when the 5th CPV became operational, based on the judgements/decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and various High Courts and Tribunals
(ii) To direct the respondents to grant benefits of revised pay and allowances to the applicant from 01.01.1996 till the time of his retirement on actual basis
(ii
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
