Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R. N. Singh, Judicial Member, Sanjeeva Kumar, Administrative Member
Sompal Singh Tomar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reproduction and context of prior tribunal judgments (Para 1 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 2. factual background of dismissal under article 311(2)(b) (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. applicant's parity argument based on co-accused cases (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. quashing orders with liberty for fresh proceedings (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 40) |
| 5. improper invocation of article 311(2)(b) based on assumptions (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. reliance on precedents criticizing mechanical dismissals (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
By Hon’ble Mr. R. N. Singh, Member (J)
We have heard the learned counsels for the parties and with their assistance we have perused the pleadings available on record.
2. In the present O.A., the applicant has challenged an order dated 16.06.2023, whereby the applicant has been dismissed from service vide a common order dated 16.06.2023 by the Disciplinary Authority by invoking the provisions of Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution of India.
3. Aggrieved by the said order, the applicant has filed appeal and the Appellate Authority vide impugned order dated 28.03.2025 had rejected the appeal vide common impugned order dated 28.03
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
