ORDER

1.PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A): Heard. Perused the pleadings in the OA, counter so also rejoinder and materials placed in support of thereof and the law relied on by the parties. The records bespeak and betoken as under:

a. Applicant No. 1 is the widow and applicant No.2 is the son of the deceased Postal Employee, Late Goura Chandra Mohanty, who while working as Asst. Post Master (APM), Bhubaneswar GPO, prematurely died on a road accident in October, 2006.

b. Compassionate appointment was sought in favour of applicant No.2 vide application dated 11.12.2006. According to respondents, as “various aspects” were incomplete in the application, his case was not considered in the year 2007. No CRC was conducted in 2008. The case of the applicant No.2 was considered by CRC on 03.11.2009 but his case was not recommended by the CRC since his indigent condition was not as indigent in comparison to others and, accordingly, the applicants were intimated the outcome of consideration in letter dated 24/25.11.2009.

c. The said order was challenged by the applicant before this Bench in OA No. 1112/2012, in which this Bench vide order dated 21.02.2013 quashed the order of rejection and _ directed