Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ritu Tagore, Member (Judl.)
Mohd. Gulzar Parrey – Appellant
Versus
Chief Secretary J&K Government – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. outline of facts and prolonged administrative processing of the compassionate appointment claim. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 2. summary of rival contentions regarding procedural delay, limitation, and mandatory nature of the appointment rule. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. court's reasoning on the responsibility of authorities and the unfairness of rejecting claims delayed by their own inaction. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 4. final direction to the respondents to consider the applicant's claim and pass a reasoned order. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
O R D E R (FINAL)
JUSTICE RITU TAGORE, MEMBER [JUDL.]
01.Through the medium of the instant Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant seeks issuance of a direction commanding the respondents to appoint him under the Jammu & Kashmir Compassionate Appointment Rules, 1994 (SRO-43), on account of the death of his father namely Late Abdul Rahim Bhat, who died in harness while serving in the Prisons Department on the intervening night of 16th and 17th July, 2000, along with all consequential
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
