Back
CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Jishnu Barua, Chairperson, Ramesh Babu V., Member, Harish Dudani, Member, Ravinder Singh Dhillon, Member
M.P. Power Management Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
NHDC Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition details and procedural history (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. petitioner's claims on water unit correction (Para 11 , 12) |
| 3. respondent's maintainability objections (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. factual background of unit error (Para 17 , 18) |
| 5. ruling on limitation and review (Para 19 , 20) |
| 6. error correction and consequential relief (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. corrigendum retrospective application (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. rejection of finality arguments (Para 34 , 35) |
| 9. revised energy computations (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 10. refund directions and disposal (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
ORDER
M.P. Power Management Company Limited (MPPMCL), a Government-owned company of the State of Madhya Pradesh, has filed Petition No.378/MP/2022 and Petition No.220/MP/2022, under Sections 79(1)(f) and 94 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Regulations 74, 82, 111 and 112 of Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999 for considering unit of water utilisation for irrigation 'Q' from ‘BMQ’ or BM3 (Billion Cubic Meter) to 'MAFt' (Million Acre Feet) in the tariff orde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
