Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Narendra Kumar Vyas, J
Ganesh Ram Burman – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of Chhattisgarh Through Registrar General – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges termination of probationary service. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on the illegality of termination without inquiry. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondents argue termination based on performance assessment. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. petitioner cites precedents to support his claims. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court considers deliberation of judges in termination process. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. court analyzes rules regarding probation and confirmation. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 7. no automatic confirmation without certificate from authority. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 8. court concludes termination is not punitive under service rules. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 9. petitioner not entitled to reinstatement or benefits. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 10. writ petition dismissed. (Para 20) |
CAV ORDER
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition assailing the order dated 14.03.2023 by which, services of the petitioner who was on probation have been terminated by respondent No. 2 on the recommendation made by the respondent No. 1.
2. The brief facts as reflected from the record are that the petitioner was appointed as District Judge (Entry Level) by order dated 30-10-2014 (Annexure P-2) and he was posted as Additional District Judge, Raipur. It
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
