Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ
G M CONSTRUCTION – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks intervention for payment release. (Para 1 , 2 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner claims payment for work done, citing contract terms. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court discusses jurisdiction and disputed facts. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court rules on the inappropriateness of writ petitions for factual disputes. (Para 16) |
| 5. court dismisses writ petitions but allows for alternate remedies. (Para 17) |
Order on Board
Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice
19.06.2025
1. Heard Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, learned Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:
“10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records in relates to the case of the petitioner from the possession of respondents for its kind perusal.
10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents authorities particularly the respondent No. 4 to release the payment towards final bills of the petitioner against the work which have alread
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
