Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Bibhu Datta Guru, J
Prem Narayan Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. personal interest undermines public interest litigation. (Para 4 , 5 , 10) |
| 2. courts must ensure that pil serves genuine public interest. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice
05.08 .2025
1. Heard Mr. Jai Prakash Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the State/respondents.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following relief(s):-
“10.1 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ in the nature of mandamus/certiorari/prohibition thereby to declare Rule 13(C)(1) of Chhattisgarh Medical, Dental, and Physical Treatment (Physiotherapy) Under-Graduate Admission Rules 2025 as notified in official Gazette of Chhattisgarh with No. RULE- 503/30/2025/MED Dated 16/07/2025 and the complete Admission Rules 2025 as ultra-
vires.
10.2 Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ in the nature of mandamus/certiorari/prohibition thereby to quash impugned Rule 13(C)(1) of Chhattisgarh Medical, Dental, and Physical Treatment (Physiotherapy) Graduate Admission Rules 2025 as notified in official Gazette of Chhattisgarh with No. RULE- 503/30/
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
