Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
J, Judge
Munna Khan v. State of M.P. (now Chhattisgarh)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused was convicted under section 304-a for negligence leading to death. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court emphasized the duty of care in vehicular safety and affirmed evidence. (Para 3 , 5 , 16) |
| 3. arguments against the neglect claim outlined contributory negligence but lack supporting evidence. (Para 4 , 10 , 14) |
| 4. legal standards established for direct causation in negligence, proving negligence must be clear. (Para 6 , 13 , 15) |
| 5. court's decision against probation was due to the severity of negligence in carrying passengers. (Para 17 , 18) |
1. This criminal revision has been preferred by accused / applicant Munna Khan being aggrieved by the judgment dated 8th March, 1994, passed by the Seventh Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur, in Criminal Appeal No. 139/91 affirming the judgment dated 28th November, 1991, in Criminal Case No. 1023/89 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Raipur, by which he convicted the accused / applicant under S.304 - A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo further simple imprisonment for one month.
2. The undisputed relev
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
