Back
CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
*Navin Sinha, Ag. C. J., Pritinker Diwaker, J.
Srihari Raju V. v. Municipal Corporation and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. termination of contract must follow prescribed procedures. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 2. maintainability of writ petitions in contractual disputes. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. discussion on legal expectations regarding contracts and natural justice. (Para 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. judicial review is limited in contractual matters. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. cases clarifying boundaries of writ jurisdiction. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. mala fide claims require specific evidential support. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. final judgement on maintainability and dismissal of writ. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Respondent Corporation.
2. A Contract Agreement was signed between the parties on 17-10-2005 awarding contract works to the Petitioner for installation of Automatic Traffic Signals at Twelve intersections in the city of Raipur. The duration of the contract was for 20 years. The petitioner was permitted to display commercial advertisements on the body of the illuminated traffic signals including Cabin and advertising banners of specified dimensions only as mentioned in the Contract. Clause 6. 1 of the Contract permitted either party to terminate the Agr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
