Shukrajit Nayak v. Roshanlal Agrawal and Others

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2016 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 22

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Shukrajit Nayak v. Roshanlal Agrawal and Others

Advocates:
For the Appellant: [name]
For the Respondent: [name]

Table of Content
1. allegations of corrupt practices made by the petitioner. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments asserting the ambiguity of the allegations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's analysis on necessity of clear material facts. (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 19 , 20)
4. court ruling on the sufficiency of the election petition. (Para 18 , 27)

1. The order shall govern the disposal of IA No. 2, an application under O.7 R.11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, filed by the respondent No. 1, the returned candidate, wherein the respondent No. 1 has challenged the tenability of the election petition and raised the preliminary objection that the election petition do not disclose the cause of action.

2. The petition is preferred inter - alia claiming the following relief : -
(1). declare the election of the respondent in the constituency No. 16 of Raigarh (C. G.) as void.
(2). thus declare the petitioner as the successful elected candidate.
(3). and / or any other relief as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice.

3. As would evident from the prayer made, the challenge is on the ground that the petitioner, who belongs to Indian National Congress for Legislative Assembly Constituency, 16 Raigarh and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2016 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 22

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURTSanjay K. Agrawal, JShukrajit Nayak v. Roshanlal Agrawal and Others

Cases Referred (2)

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Shukrajit Nayak v. Roshanlal Agrawal and Others