SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 80

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Chandra Bhushan Bajpai, J.
Jagdish Buddhuuram and Others v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others


Table of Content
1. the appeal concerns jurisdictional issues regarding non-prosecution in lok adalats. (Para 1 , 4 , 5)
2. the lok adalat must return cases without settlement to the referring court. (Para 2 , 3 , 8 , 10)
3. the court sets aside the lok adalat's dismissal and reaffirms trial court authority. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since a pure question of law is involved in the matter, the matter may be disposed of without noticing respondent No. 5 - Gram Panchayat Sarpanch Pachri and also issuance of notice to respondent No. 6 is not necessary, as per law. On due consideration, the matter is heard finally at the motion stage without issuance of notice to respondent No. 5.

2. The brief facts required for disposal of the instant W. P. (227) are that Civil Suit No. 183A of 1997 (New Number 102A of 2011) (Jagdish and 3 others v. State of Chhattisgarh and 4 others) was pending before the Civil Judge, Class - I, Akaltara, District Janjgir - Champa, Chhattisgarh. During pendency of the said civil suit, on 7-2-2012, at the request of both the parties the matter was referred for disposal as per relevant provisions of the Legal Services





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top