SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987

Read full Act
S.22C Cognizance of cases by Permanent Lok Adalat.

(1) Any party to a dispute may, before the dispute is brought before any court, make an application to the Permanent Lok Adalat for the settlement of dispute:



Provided that the Permanent Lok Adalat shall not have jurisdiction in respect of any matter relating to an offence not compoundable under any law:


Provided further that the Permanent Lok Adalat shall also not have jurisdiction in the matter where the value of the property in dispute exceeds ten lakh rupees:


Provided also that the Central Government, may by notification, increase the limit of ten lakh rupees specified in the second proviso in consultation with the Central Authority.


(2) After a

Legal Commentary on Section 22C of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987

Introduction

Section 22C of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, establishes the framework for the functioning, jurisdiction, and procedural aspects of Permanent Lok Adalats (PLAs). It aims to provide an alternative dispute resolution mechanism for disputes relating to public utility services, emphasizing conciliation, settlement, and limited adjudication. The section is integral to promoting access to justice, especially for weaker sections of society, by enabling pre-litigation resolution and final binding awards.

What does Section 22C Say?

Section 22C delineates the procedure for initiating, conciliation, adjudication, and finality of awards by Permanent Lok Adalats:- Any party to a dispute may, before approaching a court, apply to a PLA for settlement (sub-section 1).- The PLA shall first attempt conciliation and facilitate settlement (sub-section 4).- If the parties fail to reach an agreement, the PLA shall decide the dispute (sub-section 8), provided the dispute falls within its jurisdiction and value limits.- The awards passed are final and binding, deemed to be decrees of a civil court (sub-section 8).- The PLA is guided by principles of natural justice, fairness, and equity and is not bound by the Civil Procedure Code or Evidence Act (Section 22D).- The awards are executable as decrees, with limited grounds for challenge, primarily through writ petitions under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution (Section 22E).

Essential Ingredients

  • Pre-litigation Application: Dispute must be initiated before filing in court (Section 22C(1)).
  • Jurisdiction & Scope: Limited to disputes concerning public utility services, with monetary limits (generally up to Rs. 10 lakhs).
  • Conciliation First: Mandatory attempt at settlement under Sections 22C(4)-(7).
  • Decision on Merits: Only if conciliation fails, the PLA proceeds to adjudicate (Section 22C(8)).
  • Final & Binding Awards: Awards are deemed to be civil court decrees, final and binding on parties.
  • No Appeal: No statutory appeal against the award, but challenge permissible via writ petitions on limited grounds.
  • Principles of Justice: Guided by natural justice, fairness, and equity.
  • Non-application to Offences: Disputes relating to criminal offences or exceeding jurisdictional monetary limits are outside PLA's scope.

Scope of Section 22C

  • Disputes Relating to Public Utility Services: Includes transport, communication, supply of power, water, sanitation, insurance, and hospital services as notified.
  • Pre-litigation Dispute Resolution: Encourages resolution before courts, reducing backlog.
  • Limited Jurisdiction: Generally up to Rs. 10 lakhs, with exceptions based on notifications.
  • Finality & Executability: Awards are final, with limited judicial review, primarily through writ petitions.
  • Procedural Framework: Mandates attempts at conciliation, with adjudication as a fallback.
  • Scope Limitations: Cannot decide disputes involving criminal offences, or where jurisdiction is barred by other statutes (e.g., Electricity Act, 2003).

Punishment for Violations

  • Non-compliance with Procedure: Awards passed without following the prescribed procedure can be set aside (as seen in case law).
  • Illegality in Jurisdiction: Awards passed beyond jurisdiction or without proper consent are liable to be quashed.
  • Malpractice or Fraud: If fraud or collusion is established, awards may be challenged and set aside.
  • Failure to Follow Procedural Norms: Courts have quashed awards where the PLA bypassed mandatory steps or exceeded jurisdiction.
  • No Direct Punishment: The Act does not prescribe criminal penalties; violations primarily result in judicial quashing or setting aside awards.

Legal Comments

  • Jurisdiction - The PLA's jurisdiction is limited to disputes concerning notified public utility services and within monetary limits, as per Section 22C(8) - [Section 22C(8)]; upheld in various rulings confirming the scope is confined to specific services and value thresholds.
  • Pre-litigation Application - Any party can initiate proceedings before approaching courts, promoting alternative dispute resolution - [Section 22C(1)]; reinforced in case law emphasizing the mandatory pre-litigation step.
  • Conciliation Requirement - The PLA must first attempt conciliation under Sections 22C(4)-(7); failure to do so renders adjudication invalid - [Section 22C(4)]; as held in multiple judgments, procedural compliance is mandatory.
  • Final & Binding Awards - Awards are deemed equivalent to decrees of civil courts, final and binding on parties, with limited scope for appeal - [Section 22E]; courts have upheld awards unless procedural irregularities or jurisdictional errors are established.
  • Principles of Justice - The PLA is guided by natural justice, fairness, and equity, not bound by CPC or Evidence Act - [Section 22D]; case law confirms adherence to principles of natural justice is essential.
  • Challenge & Judicial Review - Awards can be challenged only via writ petitions, and only on limited grounds such as jurisdictional errors, fraud, or procedural violations - [Section 22E]; upheld in Supreme Court rulings.
  • Scope & Limitations - Disputes involving criminal offences or exceeding jurisdictional monetary limits are outside the scope of PLA - [Section 22C(8)]; judicial pronouncements have clarified boundaries.
  • Procedural Irregularities - Awards passed without proper adherence to procedural norms, such as failure to conduct conciliation, are liable to be quashed - [Case: WP(C) 2477/2008]; as seen in judgments where procedural lapses invalidated awards.
  • Finality & Enforcement - Awards are executable as decrees, but subject to judicial scrutiny for legality and jurisdiction - [Section 22E]; courts have enforced awards where procedural norms were followed.
  • Role of the PLA - Acts as a conciliator and adjudicator, with a statutory obligation to make efforts for settlement before adjudication - [Section 22C(4)]; case law emphasizes the conciliatory role.
  • Legal Validity & Constitutionality - The provisions, including the finality of awards and limited judicial review, have been upheld as constitutional - [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 543/2002]; courts have dismissed challenges on constitutional grounds.
  • Procedural Compliance - The PLA must follow the prescribed procedure, including attempts at conciliation, before passing awards - [Section 22C(4)-(7)]; non-compliance leads to awards being set aside.
  • Protection of Weaker Sections - The Act aims to facilitate access to justice for weaker sections through simplified procedures and final awards - [Section 22C]; judicial decisions have reinforced the social justice intent.
  • Finality & Enforcement - Awards are final and can be executed as decrees, but courts can interfere if procedural or jurisdictional violations are proven - [Section 22E]; upheld in Supreme Court judgments.
  • No Appeal Mechanism - No appeal lies against awards, only challenge through writ petitions on limited grounds - [Section 22E]; consistent with judicial precedents.
  • Role of the Court - Courts primarily function as constitutional guardians, ensuring procedural fairness and jurisdictional correctness of PLA awards - [Case Law: Inter Globe Aviation Ltd.].

This comprehensive analysis underscores that Section 22C of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, provides a structured, limited, and final dispute resolution mechanism, balancing efficiency, justice, and procedural safeguards. Judicial decisions have consistently upheld its constitutional validity, emphasizing adherence to procedural norms and jurisdictional limits.

S.19 Organisation of Lok Adalats.

1 [19. Organisation of Lok Adalats.—(1) Every State Authority or District Authority or the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee or every High Court Legal Services Committee or, as the case may be, Taluk Legal Services Committee may organise Lok Adalats at such intervals and places and for exercising such jurisdiction and for such areas as it thinks fit.


(2) Every Lok Adalat organised for an area shall consist of such number of—

(a) serving or retired judicial officers; and

(b) other persons,

of the area as may be specified by the State Authority or the District Authority or the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee or the High Court Legal Services Commi

Legal Commentary on Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987

Introduction

Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, lays down the statutory framework for the organization and functioning of Lok Adalats, which serve as alternative dispute resolution mechanisms aimed at promoting access to justice, especially for marginalized and weaker sections of society. It emphasizes the role of legal service authorities in facilitating settlement and compromise outside formal judicial proceedings, thereby reducing litigation burden and ensuring speedy justice.

What does Section 19 Say?

Section 19 provides for the organization of Lok Adalats at various levels—State, District, and Supreme Court or High Court—by authorized legal service agencies. It grants Lok Adalats the jurisdiction to resolve disputes through compromise or settlement in respect of cases pending before courts or cases falling within their jurisdiction that are not yet brought before any court. The section explicitly states that Lok Adalats do not have jurisdiction over matters relating to non-compoundable offences. The awards passed by Lok Adalats are deemed to be decrees of civil courts, with final and binding effect, and no appeal lies against such awards, except through limited judicial review under Articles 226/227.

Essential Ingredients

  • Organization of Lok Adalats: By designated authorities at various levels.
  • Jurisdiction: To determine and settle disputes through compromise in pending cases or cases within their jurisdiction not yet filed in courts.
  • Settlement Process: Voluntary agreement between parties, facilitated by Lok Adalat.
  • Finality of Awards: Awards are deemed to be decrees of civil courts, final and binding.
  • Limitations: No jurisdiction over non-compoundable offences; no appeal against awards except via writ petitions on limited grounds.
  • Procedure: Conducted with utmost expedition, guided by principles of natural justice, fairness, and equity.

Scope of Section 19

Section 19 covers a broad spectrum of disputes, including civil, family, property, and certain criminal matters (compoundable offences). It aims to promote amicable settlement outside formal courts, thus reducing litigation backlog. The scope includes:- Cases pending before courts.- Cases not yet filed but falling within jurisdiction.- Disputes capable of settlement through compromise.- Cases involving family matters, property disputes, and certain criminal offences (compoundable).

However, it explicitly excludes non-compoundable offences, emphasizing the limited jurisdiction of Lok Adalats in criminal law.

Punishment for Violations

While Section 19 itself does not prescribe specific punishments, violations such as acting beyond jurisdiction (e.g., passing awards in non-compoundable offences) or conducting proceedings without proper authority may attract legal consequences, including quashing of awards or disciplinary action against judicial officers or legal service providers involved in misconduct, as per the overarching provisions of the Act and applicable criminal law.

Legal Comments

  • Jurisdictional Scope - Section 19 empowers Lok Adalats to settle pending cases and cases within their jurisdiction that are not yet filed, promoting alternative dispute resolution. [Section 19 of the Act]
  • Final and Binding Nature - Awards passed by Lok Adalats are deemed to be decrees of civil courts, final, binding, and not subject to appeal, ensuring enforceability. [Section 21-A]
  • No Appeal - No appeal lies against the awards of Lok Adalats except through writ petitions under Articles 226/227, on limited grounds such as fraud or misrepresentation. [Section 21-A] & [Section 19(5)]
  • Limited Criminal Jurisdiction - Lok Adalats cannot entertain cases involving non-compoundable offences; their jurisdiction is confined to compoundable offences or civil disputes. [Section 19(5)] & [Section 22-C(8)]
  • Settlement Procedure - The process relies on mutual agreement, with the parties voluntarily arriving at settlement, which is recorded and signed by parties or their authorized agents. [Section 19(5)] & [Section 20]
  • Role of Judicial Officers - Judicial officers or trained mediators facilitate settlement; their role is conciliatory, not adjudicatory, unless the matter involves a dispute on merits that can be decided by the Lok Adalat. [Section 19(2), 19(3), 22D]
  • Procedural Safeguards - Proper procedure mandates that Lok Adalats act with fairness, giving parties adequate opportunity, and ensuring signatures of all parties before passing awards. [Section 19(5)] & [Section 20]
  • Inadmissibility of Awards in Non-Compoundable Offences - Awards relating to non-compoundable offences are null and void, as Lok Adalats lack jurisdiction over such matters. [Section 19(5)] & [Section 22-C(8)]
  • Awards as Decrees - The legal fiction that awards are deemed decrees facilitates their enforcement; however, such awards are only enforceable if passed within jurisdiction and under proper procedure. [Section 21-A] & [Section 21]
  • Challenge to Awards - Limited grounds for challenging awards include fraud, coercion, or misrepresentation; otherwise, awards are final. [Section 19(5)] & [Section 21-A]
  • Misuse and Overreach - Conducting proceedings without jurisdiction, such as passing awards in non-compoundable offences or in disputes not pending before courts, can lead to awards being quashed. [Section 19(5)] & [Section 22-C(8)]
  • Role in Pre-Litigation and Pending Cases - Section 19 facilitates settlement of disputes both before and during litigation, but only where jurisdiction exists and disputes are genuine. [Section 19(5)] & [Section 20]
  • Legal Validity of Settlement - Settlements recorded and signed by parties are legally valid; signatures of authorized agents or advocates do not substitute for parties' signatures unless expressly authorized. [Section 19(5)] & [Order XXIII CPC]
  • Legal Oversight and Superintendence - High Courts possess supervisory jurisdiction to quash awards or proceedings conducted without proper authority or in violation of law. [Article 227 & Section 19(5)]
  • Inapplicability in Non-Compoundable Offences - Orders or awards in offences not compoundable are null, emphasizing the importance of jurisdictional limits. [Section 19(5)] & [Section 22-C(8)]
  • Enforceability of Awards - Awards are enforceable as decrees, and execution is through civil courts, but only if passed within jurisdiction and following due process. [Section 21-A]
  • Disputes Not Pending Before Courts - The Act does not empower Lok Adalats to entertain claims or disputes that are not pending before any court or authority, ensuring procedural integrity. [Section 19(5)] & [Notification dated 25.2.2004]
  • Misconduct and Malpractice - Any procedural irregularity, such as passing awards without jurisdiction or in non-compoundable offences, can lead to judicial review and quashing of awards. [Section 19(5)] & [Section 22-C(8)]

This legal commentary underscores the importance of jurisdictional limits, procedural safeguards, and the finality of awards under Section 19, while highlighting the limitations and safeguards necessary to prevent abuse of the Lok Adalat system.

S.3 Constitution of the National Legal Services Authority.

1 [3. Constitution of the National Legal Services Authority.—(1) The Central Government shall constitute a body to be called the National Legal Services Authority to exercise the powers and perform the functions conferred on, or assigned to, the Central Authority under this Act.


(2) The Central Authority shall consist of—

(a) the Chief Justice of India who shall be the Patron-in-Chief;

(b) a serving or retired Judge of the Supreme Court to be nominated by the President, in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, who shall be the Executive Chairman; and

(c) such number of ot

S.3A Supreme Court Legal Services Committee.

(1) The Central Authority shall constitute a committee to be called the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee for the purpose of exercising such powers and performing such functions as may be determined by regulations made by the Central Authority.


(2) The Committee shall consist of—

(a) a sitting Judge of the Supreme Court who shall be the Chairman; and

(b) such number of other members possessing such experience and qualifications as may be prescribed by the Central Government,

to be nominated by the Chief Justice of India.

(3) The Chief Justice of India shall appoint a person to be the Secretary to the Committee

S.4 Functions of the Central Authority.

The Central Authority shall 1 *** perform all or any of the following functions, namely:—


(a) lay down policies and principles for making legal services available under the provisions of this Act;

(b) frame the most effective and economical schemes for the purpose of making legal services available under the provisions of this Act;

(c) utilise the funds at its disposal and make appropriate allocations of funds to the State Authorities and District Authorities;

(d) take necessary steps by way of social justice litigation with regard to consumer prot

S.5 Central Authority to work in coordination with other agencies.

In the discharge of its functions under this Act, the Central Authority shall, wherever appropriate, act in coordination with other governmental and non-governmental agencies, universities and others engaged in the work of promoting the cause of legal services to the poor.




S.6 Constitution of State Legal Services Authority.

1 [6. Constitution of State Legal Services Authority.—(1) Every State Government shall constitute a body to be called the Legal Services Authority for the State to exercise the powers and perform the functions conferred on, or assigned to, a State Authority under this Act.


(2) A State Authority shall consist of—

(a) the Chief Justice of the High Court who shall be the Patron-in-Chief;

(b) a serving or retired Judge of the High Court, to be nominated by the Governor, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court, who shall be the Executive Chairman; and

(c) such number

S.7 Functions of the State Authority.

(1) It shall be the duty of the State Authority to give to effect to the policy and directions of the Central Authority.


(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the functions referred to in sub-section (1), the State Authority shall perform all or any of the following functions, namely:—

(a) give legal service to persons who satisfy the criteria laid down under this Act;

(b) conduct 1 [Lok Adalats, including Lok Adalats for High Court cases];

(c) undertake preventive and strategic legal aid programmes; and

S.8 State Authority to act in coordination with other agencies, etc., and be subject to directions given by the Central Authority.

1 [8. State Authority to act in coordination with other agencies., etc., and be subject to directions given by the Central Authority.—In the discharge of its functions the State Authority shall appropriately act in coordination with other governmental agencies, non-governmental voluntary social service institutions, universities and other bodies engaged in the work of promoting the cause of legal services to the poor and shall also be guided by such directions as the Central Authority may give to it in writing.

S.8A High Court Legal Services Committee.

(1) The State Authority shall constitute a Committee to be called the High Court Legal Services Committee for every High Court, for the purpose of exercising such powers and performing such functions as may be determined by regulations made by the State Authority.


(2) The Committee shall consist of—

(a) a sitting Judge of the High Court who shall be the Chairman; and

(b) such number of other members possessing such experience and qualifications as may be determined by regulations made by the State Authority,

to be nominated by the Chief Justice of the High Court.

(3) The Chief Justice of the High Court shall appoin

S.9 District Legal Services Authority.

(1) The State Government shall, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court, constitute a body to be called the District Legal Services Authority for every District in the State to exercise the powers and perform the functions conferred on, or assigned to, the District Authority under this Act.


(2) A District Authority shall consist of—

(a) the District Judge who shall be its Chairman; and

(b) such number of other members, possessing such experience and qualifications, as may be prescribed by the State Government, to be nominated by that Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court.

(3) The State Aut

S.10 Functions of the District Authority.

(1) It shall be the duty of every District Authority to perform such of the functions of the State Authority in the District as may be delegated to it from time to time by the State Authority.


(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the functions referred to in sub-section (1), the District Authority may perform all or any of the following functions, namely:—

1 [(a) coordinate the activities of the Taluk Legal Services Committee and other legal services in the District;]

(b) organise Lok Adalats within the District; and

(c) perform such other functions as the State Authority

S.11 District Authority to act in coordination with other agencies and be subject to directions given by the Central Authority, etc.

In the discharge of its functions under this Act, the District Authority shall, wherever appropriate, act in coordination with other governmental and non-governmental institutions, universities and others engaged in the work of promoting the cause of legal services to the poor and shall also be guided by such directions as the Central Authority or the State Authority may give to it in writing.




S.11A Taluk Legal Services Committee.

1 [11A. Taluk Legal Services Committee.—(1) The State Authority may constitute a Committee, to be called the Taluk Legal Services Committee, for each taluk or mandal or for group of taluks or mandals.


(2) The Committee shall consist of—

(a) The 2 [senior-most Judicial Officer] operating within the jurisdiction of the Committee who shall be the ex officio Chairman; and

(b) such number of other members, possessing such experience and qualifications, as may be prescribed by the State Government, to be nominated by that Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court.

(3) The Committe

S.11B Functions of Taluk Legal Services Committee.

The Taluk Legal Services Committee may perform all or any of the following functions, namely:—


(a) co-ordinate the activities of legal services in the taluk;

(b) organise Lok Adalats within the taluk; and

(c) perform such other functions as the District Authority may assign to it.]



S.12 Criteria for giving legal services.

Every person who has to file or defend a case shall be entitled to legal services under this Act if that person is


(a) a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe;

(b) a victim of trafficking in human beings or begar as referred to in article 23 of the Constitution;

(c) a woman or a child;

1 [(d) a person with disability as defined in clause (i) of section 2 of the Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (1 of 1996);]

(1) Persons who satisfy all or any of the criteria specified in section 12 shall be entitled to receive legal services provided that the concerned Authority is satisfied that such person has a prima facie case to prosecute or to defend.

(2) An affidavit made by a person as to his income may be regarded as sufficient for making him eligible to the entitlement of legal services under this Act unless the concerned Authority has reason to disbelieve such affidavit.



S.14 Grants by the Central Government.

The Central Government shall, after due appropriation made by Parliament by law in this behalf, pay to the Central Authority, by way of grants, such sums of money as the Central Government may think fit for being utilised for the purposes of this Act.




S.15 National Legal Aid Fund.

(1) The Central Authority shall establish a fund to be called the National Legal Aid Fund and there shall be credited thereto—


(a) all sums of money given as grants by the Central Government under section 14;

(b) any grants or donations that may be made to the Central Authority by any other person for the purposes of this Act;

(c) any amount received by the Central Authority under the orders of any court or from any other source.

(2) The National Legal Aid Fund shall be applied for meeting—

(a) the c

S.16 State Legal Aid Fund.

(1) A State Authority shall establish a fund to be called the State Legal Aid Fund and there shall be credited thereto—


(a) all sums of money paid to it or any grants by the Central Authority for the purposes of this Act;

(b) any grants or donations that may be made to the State Authority by the State Government or by any person for the purposes of this Act;

(c) any other amount received by the State Authority under the orders of any court or from any other source.

(2) A State Legal Aid Fund shall be applied for meeting—

(1) Every District Authority shall establish a fund to be called the District Legal Aid Fund and there shall be credited thereto—

(a) all sums of money paid or any grants made by the State Authority to the District Authority for the purposes of this Act;

1 [(b) any grants or donations that may be made to the District Authority by any person, with the prior approval of the State Authority, for the purposes of this Act;]

(c) any other amount received by the District Authority under the orders of any court or from any other source.

(2) A District Legal Aid Fund shall be applied for meeting

S.18 Accounts and audit.

(1) The Central Authority, State Authority, or the District Authority (hereinafter referred to in this section as 'the authority'), as the case may be, shall maintain proper accounts and other relevant records and prepare an annual statement of accounts including the income and expenditure account and the balance-sheet in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed by the Central Government in consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India.


(2) The accounts of the Authorities shall be audited by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India at such intervals as may be specified by him and any expenditure incurred in connection with such audit shall be payable by the Authority concerned to the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India.

(3) The Comptroller and Auditor-General of India and any other person appoin

S.20 Cognizance of cases by Lok Adalats.

(1) Where in any case referred to in clause (i) of sub-section (5) of section 19,


(i) (a) the parties thereof agree; or

(b) one of the parties thereof makes an application to the Court,

for referring the case to the Lok Adalat for settlement and if such court is prima facie satisfied that there are chances of such settlement; or

(ii) the court is satisfied that the matter is an appropriate one to be taken cognizance of by the Lok Adalat,

the Court shall refer the case to the Lok Adalat:


Provided that no case shall be re

S.21 Award of Lok Adalat.

1 [(1) Every award of the Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a decree of a civil court or, as the case may be, an order of any other court and where a compromise or settlement has been arrived at, by a Lok Adalat in a case referred to it under sub-section (1) of section 20, the court-fee paid in such case shall be refunded in the manner provided under the Court-fees Act, 1870 (7 of 1870).]


(2) Every award made by a Lok Adalat shall be final and binding on all the parties to the dispute, and no appeal shall lie to any court against the award.



S.1 Short title, extent and commencement.

This Act may be called the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.


(2) It extends to the whole of India, 1***.

(3) It shall come into force on such date2 as the Central Government may, by notification, appoint; and different dates may be appointed for different provisions of this Act and for different States, and any reference to commencement in any provision of this Act in relation to any State shall be construed as a reference to the commencement of that provision in that State.



S.22A Definitions.

1In this Chapter and for the purposes of sections 22 and 23, unless the context otherwise requires,—


(a) "Permanent Lok Adalat" means a Permanent Lok Adalat established under sub-section (1) of section 22B;

(b) "public utility service" means any—

(i) transport service for the carriage of passengers or goods by air, road or water; or

(ii) postal, telegraph or telephone service; or

S.2 Definitions.

In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,—


1 [(a) “case” includes a suit or any proceeding before a court;

(aa) “Central Authority” means the National Legal Services Authority constituted under section 3;

(aaa) “court” means a civil, criminal or revenue court and includes any tribunal or any other authority constituted under any law for the time being in force, to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial functions;]

(b) “District Authority” means a District Legal Services Authority constituted under section 9;

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 19, the Central Authority or, as the case may be, every State Authority shall, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at such places and for exercising such jurisdiction in respect of one or more public utility services and for such areas as may be specified in the notification.

(2) Every Permanent Lok Adalat established for an area notified under sub-section (1) shall consist of—

(a) a person who is, or has been, a district judge or additional district judge or has held judicial office higher in rank than that of a district judge, shall be the Chairman of the Permanent Lok Adalat; and

(b) two other persons having adequate exper

S.22D Procedure of Permanent Lok Adalat.

The Permanent Lok Adalat shall, while conducting conciliation proceedings or deciding a dispute on merit under this Act, be guided by the principles of natural justice, objectivity, fair play, equity and other principles of justice, and shall not be bound by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872).




S.22E Award of Permanent Lok Adalat to be final.

(1) Every award of the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act made either on merit or in terms of a settlement agreement shall be final and binding on all the parties thereto and on persons claiming under them.


(2) Every award of the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act shall be deemed to be a decree of a civil court.

(3) The award made by the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act shall be by a majority of the persons constituting the Permanent Lok Adalat.

(4) Every award made by the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act shall be final and shall not be called in question in any original suit, application or execution proceeding.

(5) The Permanent Lok Adalat may transmit any award made by it to a civil court having local

S.23 Members and staff of Authorities, Committees and Lok Adalats to be public servants.

1 [23. Members and staff of Authorities, Committees and Lok Adalats to be public servants.—The members including Member-Secretary or, as the case may be, Secretary of the Central Authority, the State Authority, the District Authorities, the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee, High Court Legal Services Committees, Taluk Legal Services Committees and officers and other employees of such Authorities, Committees and the 2 [members of the Lok Adalats] or the persons constituting Permanent Lok Adalats shall be deemed to be public servants within the meaning of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).




S.24 Protection of action taken in good faith.

No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against—


(a) the Central Government or State Government;

(b) the Patron-in-Chief, Executive Chairman, members of, Member-Secretary or officers or other employees of the Central Authority;

(c) Patron-in-Chief, Executive Chairman, member, Member-Secretary or officers or other employees of the State Authority;

(d) Chairman, Secretary, members or officers or other employees of the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee, High Court Legal Services Committees, Taluk Legal Services Committees or the District Au

S.25 Act to have overriding effect.

The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any instrument having effect by virtue of law other than this Act.




S.26 Power to remove difficulties.

(1) If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the Central Government may, by order published in the Official Gazette, make such provisions not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act as appear to it to be necessary or expedient for removing the difficulty:



Provided that no such order shall be made after the expiry of a period of two years from the date on which this Act receives the assent of the President.


(2) Every order made under this section shall, as soon as may be after it is made, be laid before each House of Parliament.



S.27 Power of Central Government to make rules.

1 [27. Power of Central Government to make rules.—(1) The Central Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of India may, by notification, make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act.


(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:—

(a) the number, experience and qualifications of other members of the Central Authority under clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section3;

(b) the experience and qualifications of the Member-Secretary of the Central Authority and his powers and functions under sub-section (3) of section 3;


S.28 Power of State Government to make rules.

(1) The State Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court may, by notification, make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act.


(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:—

(a) the number, experience and qualifications of other members of the State Authority under clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 6;

(b) the powers and functions of the Member-Secretary of the State Authority under sub-section (3) of section 6;

(c) the terms of office

S.29 Power of Central Authority to make regulations.

(1) The Central Authority may, by notification, make regulations not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, to provide for all matters for which provisions is necessary or expedient for the purposes of giving effect to the provisions of this Act.


(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such regulations may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:—

(a) the powers and functions of the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee under sub-section (1) of section 3A;

(b) the terms of office and other conditions relating thereto, of the members and Secretary of the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee

S.29A Power of State Authority to make regulations.

(1) The State Authority may, by notification, make regulations not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, to provide for all matters for which provision in necessary or expedient for the purposes of giving effect to the provisions of this Act.


(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such regulations may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:—

(a) the other functions to be performed by the State Authority under clause (d) of sub-section (2) of section 7;

(b) the powers and functions of the High Court Legal Services Committee under sub-section (1) of section 8A;

(1) Every rule made under this Act by the Central Government and every regulation made by the Central Authority thereunder shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session, or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or regulation, or both Houses agree that the rule or regulation should not be made, the rule or regulation shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule or regulation.

(2) Every rule made under this

S.22 Powers of Lok Adalat or Permanent Lok Adalat.

22. Powers of 1 [Lok Adalat or Permanent Lok Adalat.]—(1) The 1 [Lok Adalat or Permanent Lok Adalat] shall, for the purposes of holding any determination under this Act, have the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), while trying a suit in respect of the following matters, namely:—


(a) the summoning and enforcing the attendance of any witness and examining him on oath;

(b) the discovery and production of any document;

(c) the reception of evidence on affidavits;

(d) the req

Legal Commentary on Section 22 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987

Introduction

Section 22 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, deals with the Powers of Lok Adalat or Permanent Lok Adalat. This provision is fundamental to the functioning of Lok Adalats as alternative dispute resolution mechanisms established under the Act. The section grants these bodies the requisite powers to specify their own procedure for determining disputes coming before them, thereby enabling them to function effectively as conciliatory and adjudicatory bodies.

What Section 22 Says

Section 22 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, confers upon every Lok Adalat or Permanent Lok Adalat the following powers:

  1. Procedural Autonomy: The power to specify its own procedure for determination of any dispute coming before it.
  2. Civil Court Powers: All powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, while trying a suit in respect of:
  3. (a) Summoning and enforcing attendance of witnesses and examining them on oath
  4. (b) Discovery and production of documents
  5. (c) Reception of evidence on affidavits
  6. (d) Requisitioning of any public record or copy thereof from any court or office
  7. Deemed Civil Court: Every proceeding before a Lok Adalat or Permanent Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of sections 193, 219, and 228 of the Indian Penal Code.

Essential Ingredients

The essential ingredients of Section 22 include:

  • Power to regulate procedure: Lok Adalats/PLAs can determine their own procedure.
  • Civil procedure powers: They have powers analogous to civil courts for specific purposes.
  • Deemed judicial proceedings: Proceedings are treated as judicial proceedings under IPC.
  • Applicability to both: The section applies to both Lok Adalats and Permanent Lok Adalats equally.

Scope of Section

The scope of Section 22 extends to:

  1. Territorial Jurisdiction: The Permanent Lok Adalat can only exercise jurisdiction within its territorial limits. [Keshari Devi VS Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. - 2012 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1740]
  2. Conciliation vs. Adjudication: The primary role of Lok Adalat is conciliation, not adjudication. [State Bank of India, Dhanbad VS State of Jharkhand - 2009 0 Supreme(Jhk) 521]
  3. Pre-litigation matters: PLAs can entertain disputes before they are brought before courts.
  4. Non-applicability of CPC and Evidence Act: PLAs are not bound by CPC and Evidence Act but guided by principles of natural justice. [United India Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Ajay Sinha and another - 2008 4 Supreme 528]

Punishment under Section 22

Section 22 itself does not prescribe any punishment. However, since proceedings before Lok Adalats are deemed judicial proceedings (IPC Sections 193, 219, 228), any person committing offences like perjury, threatening witnesses, or showing disrespect to the Lok Adalat can be prosecuted under relevant IPC provisions.

Legal Comments

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Enter the Future of Legal Excellence with SupremeToday AI

Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.

experience-legal
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top