Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Vijay Kumar Barman and Another v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of human trafficking leading to charges. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by petitioners versus prosecution. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's procedure and considerations for charge framing. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. legal standards for assessing prima facie evidence. (Para 7 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. conclusion reaffirming charges upheld. (Para 15 , 16) |
1. This revision has been preferred under S.397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the order dated 7.12.2016 passed in Sessions Trial No.183 of 2015 by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti, District Janjgir - Champa by which the Petitioners have been charged under S.370(3) read with S.34 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. Case of the prosecution, as per the charges framed by the Court below against the Petitioners, is that 1 year prior to 20.7.2015, the Petitioners along with one Sandeep Karthiya made a common intention and in furtherance of their common intention they took Aghanbai, Bhuribai, Pooja Barman and other villagers of Village Parsada, Police Station Hasaud, District Janjgir - Champa as also some villagers of nearby villages of the same police station, in total 22 villagers, in installments, without getting their names ente
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
