Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Kashiram Sahu and Another v. Ramesar alias Rameshwar Sahu and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts leading to appeal regarding abatement and delay. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding procedural application. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court observations on the need for a liberal approach to procedural rules. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
1. Heard on admission.
2. This is a Miscellaneous Appeal preferred under O.43, R.1(k) of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 (for short 'the CPC') by the legal representatives / Applicants of the sole deceased Plaintiff namely Bisesar Sahu against the order, dated 22.12.2016 passed by the 1st Additional District Judge, Durg in Civil Suit No.3 - A / 2002, by which the applications filed under O.22, R.3, O.22, R.9, CPC and S.5 of the Indian Limitation Act have been rejected.
3. The undisputed facts of the case are that the original Plaintiff Besesar instituted a suit for declaration of title, partition and for separate possession by claiming 1/7th share with regard to the Plaint - Schedule A, B and C properties as described detailed in the said Schedules. During the pendency of the suit, the sole Plaintiff - Besesar expired on 28.2.2012. Upon his death, an application as required under O.22, R.3, CPC has been made by hi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
