Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
, CJ
A Suo Moto Taken Writ v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the issue of jurisdiction regarding arbitration cases. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the interpretation of jurisdiction by various high courts. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. discussion on the definitions and structure of the arbitration act. (Para 4 , 8 , 12) |
| 4. clarification of the roles of district and additional district judges in arbitration. (Para 28 , 41) |
| 5. conclusion affirming the jurisdiction of additional district judges in executing arbitration awards. (Para 43) |
1. This suo motu petition under Art.227 of the Constitution of India is a reference made to the Full Bench by Hon'ble the Chief Justice on a request made by the District & Sessions Judge, Durg, in its memo dated 5-3-2018 to the effect that 859 Arbitration Cases are pending before the District & Sessions Judge i.e., the Principal Civil Court of Original Jurisdiction which cannot be transferred to the Court of Additional District Judge(s) functioning within his jurisdiction in view of the judgment rendered by this Court in the matter of Raipur Development Authority v. M/s. Sarin Construction Company , Raipur (AIR 2006 Chh 12), therefore, requesting the High Court to issue guidelines for trans
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
