Back
CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAIPUR
C.B. Bajpai, J, Narendra Gupta (Member), Ruchi Goel (Member)
O.P. No. 1 – Appellant
Versus
Complainant – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of consumer complaint and initial ruling. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by appellants regarding contractual compliance and remuneration. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's observations on agreed terms of service. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's determination on appeal basis and legal validity. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. final ruling on appeals and order quashing. (Para 15) |
1. Since both the appeals arise out of the order dated 2.8.2018, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (in brevity District Forum) in Complaint Case No. 429/2013, hence both are being disposed of by this common order.
2. The matter comes before us for the third round, which is clearly mentioned in the para 2 of the impugned order, hence we are not reproducing the said facts for unnecessary repetition.
3. The complainant had given a sum of Rs. 2,50,000 to the O.P. No. 1 and thereafter the complainant and the O.P. No. 2 entered into an agreement for finance of the tractor. The O.P. No. 2 taken signatures of the complainant and thereafter the O.P. No. 1 gave tractor to the complainant without trolley, hence the tractor cannot be operated without any trolley. The said
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
