Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
, J
Maa Tarini Traders v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging arbitrary actions in tender processes (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. judicial scrutiny in tender decision-making processes (Para 2 , 4 , 6 , 9) |
| 3. arguments regarding the validity of bids and tender processes (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. regulatory framework governing auction processes for quarrying (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. requirements for auction bidding procedures (Para 14 , 15 , 18) |
| 6. permissibility of fresh tenders in absence of better bids (Para 24 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. setting aside improper tender decisions (Para 29) |
| 8. conclusion allowing the writ petition (Para 30) |
1. The alleged arbitrary course of action pursued by the Respondent authorities in connection with the tender floated for granting quarrying lease in a "reverse auction process", eliminating the qualified bidder / Petitioner, by considering the fresh quote of the already rejected bidder along with bids quoted by four other persons within the extended time and allotting the same to the 4th Respondent (father of the rejected bidder) by drawing "lots" (as all the quotes were of uniform rate), is the subject matter of challenge in this writ petition.
2. At the very outset it has to be mentioned that, scrutiny is being conduct
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
