1. The substantial question of law involved, formulated and to be answered in this second appeal preferred by the appellants / legal representatives of the plaintiff is as under :
"Whether the first appellate Court is justified in holding that the suit filed by the appellant / plaintiff was barred by limitation, by recording a finding which is perverse and contrary to record ?"
[For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred hereinafter as per their status shown and ranking given in the suit before the trial Court].

2. The suit property mentioned in Schedule 'A' attached with the plaint is situated at village Kerta, Tahsil Pratappur bearing khasra Nos.907 and 908 area 1.13 and 1.69 and was originally held by Sukhna as recorded in Ex.P2. He had two sons namely Gangu and Mangla. Mangla was original plaintiff and defendant Nos.1 to 3 are sons of Gangu. It is the case of the plaintiff that the suit land is self - acquired prope