SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2772

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
S. Murali – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. introduction of case and context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. facts involving duty under factory act. (Para 4 , 5)
3. arguments on double jeopardy and legal conflicts. (Para 7 , 12)
4. judicial interpretation of distinct legal responsibilities. (Para 14 , 25)

1. Since common question of law and facts are involved in both the petitions under S.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (henceforth 'the Code'), they heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. Petitioner - S. Murali has filed the petition Cri. M. P. No. 1057/2014 challenging the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No. 428/2014 pending before Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dabhra, Distt. Janjgir - Champa arising out of the FIR No. 65/14 registered at Police Station Dabhra, Distt. Janjgir - Champa for the offence punishable under S.304 - A / 34 of the Indian Penal Code whereas Petitioner - N. Krishna Kumar has filed the petition Cri.M.P. No. 165/2015 challenging the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No. 406/2014 pending before Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Raigarh, District Raigarh arising out of the FIR No. 33/2014 registered at Police Station Kotra Road, Distt. Raigarh for






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top